» Articles » PMID: 36001608

Barriers, Enablers and Acceptability of Home-based Care Following Elective Total Knee or Hip Replacement at a Private Hospital: A Qualitative Study of Patient and Caregiver Perspectives

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2022 Aug 24
PMID 36001608
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: To facilitate implementation of home-based care following an elective total knee or hip replacement in a private hospital, we explored patient and caregiver barriers and enablers and components of care that may increase its acceptability.

Method: Thirty-one patients (mean age 71 years, 77% female) and 14 caregivers (mean age 69 years, 57% female) were interviewed. All themes were developed using thematic analysis, then categorised as barriers or enablers to uptake of home-based care or acceptable components of care. Barrier and enabler themes were mapped to the Theoretical Domains Framework.

Results: Eight themes emerged as barriers or enablers: feeling unsafe versus confident; caregivers' willingness to provide support and patients' unwillingness to seek help; less support and opportunity to rest; positive feelings about home over the hospital; certainty about anticipated recovery; trusting specialist advice over family and friends; length of hospital stay; paying for health insurance. Five themes emerged as acceptable components: home visits prior to discharge; specific information about recovery at home; one-to-one physiotherapy and occupational therapy perceived as first-line care; medical, nursing and a 24/7 direct-line perceived as second-line care for complications; no one-size-fits-all model for domestic support. Theoretical domains relating to barriers included emotion (e.g., feeling unsafe), environmental context and resources (e.g., perceived lack of physiotherapy) and beliefs about consequences (e.g., unwillingness to burden their caregiver). Theoretical domains relating to enablers included beliefs about capabilities (e.g., feeling strong), skills (e.g., practising stairs), procedural knowledge (e.g., receiving advice about early mobility) and social influences (e.g., caregivers' willingness to provide support).

Conclusions: Multiple factors, such as feeling unsafe and caregivers' willingness to provide support, may influence implementation of home-based care from the perspectives of privately insured patients and caregivers. Our findings provide insights to inform design of suitable home-based care following joint replacement in a private setting.

Citing Articles

An Emergency Department Virtual Observation Unit Fall Prevention Program: A Pilot Acceptability Study.

Numata K, Jones A, Meeker M, Kennedy M, Hayden E, Ouchi K Cureus. 2025; 17(2):e78624.

PMID: 40065891 PMC: 11891499. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.78624.


Considerations for establishment of a private virtual hospital identified using an implementation science approach.

Fisher O, Grogan C, Barron A, Kanagarajah S, Smith S, Smith I Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):3660.

PMID: 39880892 PMC: 11779871. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-85965-5.


Implementing an enhanced recovery from surgery pathway to reduce hospital length of stay for primary hip or knee arthroplasty: a budget impact analysis.

Lloyd M, Ademi Z, Harris I, Naylor J, Lewis P, de Steiger R BMC Health Serv Res. 2024; 24(1):1540.

PMID: 39633364 PMC: 11616323. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-11871-7.


Factors influencing the implementation of early discharge hospital at home and admission avoidance hospital at home: a qualitative evidence synthesis.

Wallis J, Shepperd S, Makela P, Han J, Tripp E, Gearon E Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024; 3:CD014765.

PMID: 38438114 PMC: 10911892. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD014765.pub2.


Acceptability and feasibility of home and hospital follow-up in Burkina Faso and Guinea: A mixed-method study among patients of the COVID-19 Coverage-Africa clinical trial.

Plazy M, Doucet M, Timbo Songbono C, Sanon A, Issiaka B, Martin C PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023; 3(7):e0001545.

PMID: 37437024 PMC: 10337897. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001545.

References
1.
Caplan G, Sulaiman N, Mangin D, Aimonino Ricauda N, Wilson A, Barclay L . A meta-analysis of "hospital in the home". Med J Aust. 2012; 197(9):512-9. DOI: 10.5694/mja12.10480. View

2.
Thorne S . Toward methodological emancipation in applied health research. Qual Health Res. 2010; 21(4):443-53. DOI: 10.1177/1049732310392595. View

3.
Cunliffe A, Gladman J, Husbands S, Miller P, Dewey M, Harwood R . Sooner and healthier: a randomised controlled trial and interview study of an early discharge rehabilitation service for older people. Age Ageing. 2004; 33(3):246-52. DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afh076. View

4.
Chen J, Zhu X, Jiang J, Qi Y, Shi Y . Needs of Chinese patients undergoing home-based rehabilitation after hip replacement: A qualitative study. PLoS One. 2019; 14(7):e0220304. PMC: 6660078. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220304. View

5.
Sekhon M, Cartwright M, Francis J . Acceptability of healthcare interventions: an overview of reviews and development of a theoretical framework. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017; 17(1):88. PMC: 5267473. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-017-2031-8. View