The Italian Telephone-based Verbal Fluency Battery (t-VFB): Standardization and Preliminary Clinical Usability Evidence
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Background: This study aimed at standardizing and providing preliminary evidence on the clinical usability of the Italian telephone-based Verbal Fluency Battery (t-VFB), which includes phonemic (t-PVF), semantic (t-SVF) and alternate (t-AVF) verbal fluency tasks.
Methods: Three-hundred and thirty-five Italian healthy participants (HPs; 140 males; age = 18-96 years; education = 4-23 years) and 27 individuals with neurodegenerative or cerebrovascular diseases were administered the t-VFB. Switch number and cluster size were computed latent semantic analyses. HPs underwent the telephone-based Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Backward Digit Span (BDS). Construct validity, factorial structure, internal consistency, test-retest and inter-rater reliability and equivalence with the in-person Verbal Fluency tasks were assessed. Norms were derived Equivalent Scores. Diagnostic accuracy against clinical populations was assessed.
Results: The majority of t-VFB scores correlated among each other and with the BDS, but not with the MMSE. Switch number correlated with t-PVF, t-SVF, t-AVF scores, whilst cluster size with the t-SVF and t-AVF scores only. The t-VFB was underpinned by a mono-component structure and was internally consistent (Cronbach's α = 0.91). Test-retest (ICC = 0.69-0.95) and inter-rater reliability (ICC = 0.98-1) were optimal. Each t-VFB test was statistically equivalent to its in-person version (equivalence bounds yielding a < 0.05). Education predicted all t-VFB scores, whereas age t-SVF and t-AVF scores and sex only some t-SVF scores. Diagnostic accuracy against clinical samples was optimal (AUC = 0.81-0.86).
Discussion: The t-VFB is a valid, reliable and normed telephone-based assessment tool for language and executive functioning, equivalent to the in-person version; results show promising evidence of its diagnostic accuracy in neurological populations.
Aiello E, Mameli F, Ruggiero F, Zirone E, Zago S, Piacentini S Neurol Sci. 2024; 45(8):3767-3774.
PMID: 38467953 PMC: 11255082. DOI: 10.1007/s10072-024-07436-5.
Panzavolta A, Cerami C, Caffarra P, De Vita D, Dodich A, Fonti C Neurol Sci. 2024; 45(7):3125-3135.
PMID: 38378904 DOI: 10.1007/s10072-024-07403-0.
Aiello E, Pucci V, Diana L, Corvaglia A, Niang A, Mattiello S Neurol Sci. 2023; 45(5):1989-2001.
PMID: 38010584 PMC: 11021315. DOI: 10.1007/s10072-023-07149-1.
Diana L, Regazzoni R, Sozzi M, Piconi S, Borghesi L, Lazzaroni E J Neurol Sci. 2022; 444:120511.
PMID: 36473347 PMC: 9707027. DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2022.120511.