» Articles » PMID: 35992104

FSH and Bone: Comparison Between Males with Central Versus Primary Hypogonadism

Overview
Specialty Endocrinology
Date 2022 Aug 22
PMID 35992104
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Experimental studies proposed a direct effect of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) on the skeletal metabolism, but results of human studies mainly conducted in females are controversial. The present study aims to investigate the possible role of FSH excess in male bone health, by comparing for the first time primary and central hypogonadism.

Design And Methods: 119 men were enrolled in this cross-sectional observational study at the time of the first diagnosis of hypogonadism. All participants had spontaneous pubertal development. Regarding patients with hypergonadotropic hypogonadism (Hyper-H), Klinefelter syndrome (KS) patients were distinguished from the other forms (non-KS-Hyper-H) based on the onset of FSH elevation. Bone mineral density (BMD) at both lumbar spine (LS) and femoral neck (FN), as well as the prevalence of morphometric vertebral fractures (VFx), were assessed.

Results: Across the whole cohort, higher LS and FN BMD were associated with older age at diagnosis and higher body mass index (BMI), respectively. After adjusting for potential confounders (age at diagnosis, BMI, smoking habits, degree of hypogonadism defined by calculated free testosterone, and 25OH vitamin D levels), non-KS-Hyper-H patients showed significantly lower LS BMD and tended to show lower FN BMD values, as compared to those with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (Hypo-H). In KS men, LS BMD was significantly lower than in those with non-KS-Hyper-H. No significant differences in the prevalence of VFx were found between the groups.

Conclusions: These findings suggest a potential negative effect of FSH excess on the male bone mass, especially at spine. The duration of high FSH levels may also contribute to these findings.

Citing Articles

Research progress on FSH-FSHR signaling in the pathogenesis of non-reproductive diseases.

Li C, Ling Y, Kuang H Front Cell Dev Biol. 2024; 12:1506450.

PMID: 39633710 PMC: 11615068. DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2024.1506450.


The complications of male hypogonadism: is it just a matter of low testosterone?.

Munari E, Amer M, Amodeo A, Bollino R, Federici S, Goggi G Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023; 14:1201313.

PMID: 37455904 PMC: 10338218. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1201313.


Extra-Gonadal and Non-Canonical Effects of FSH in Males.

Spaziani M, Carlomagno F, Tenuta M, Sesti F, Angelini F, Bonaventura I Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2023; 16(6).

PMID: 37375761 PMC: 10300833. DOI: 10.3390/ph16060813.


Osteoporosis and bone metabolism in patients with Klinefelter syndrome.

Grande G, Graziani A, Di Mambro A, Selice R, Ferlin A Endocr Connect. 2023; 12(8).

PMID: 37166398 PMC: 10388662. DOI: 10.1530/EC-23-0058.

References
1.
Cangiano B, Duminuco P, Vezzoli V, Guizzardi F, Chiodini I, Corona G . Evidence for a Common Genetic Origin of Classic and Milder Adult-Onset Forms of Isolated Hypogonadotropic Hypogonadism. J Clin Med. 2019; 8(1). PMC: 6352096. DOI: 10.3390/jcm8010126. View

2.
Wu Y, Torchia J, Yao W, Lane N, Lanier L, Nakamura M . Bone microenvironment specific roles of ITAM adapter signaling during bone remodeling induced by acute estrogen-deficiency. PLoS One. 2007; 2(7):e586. PMC: 1895921. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000586. View

3.
Zhu L, Blair H, Cao J, Yuen T, Latif R, Guo L . Blocking antibody to the β-subunit of FSH prevents bone loss by inhibiting bone resorption and stimulating bone synthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012; 109(36):14574-9. PMC: 3437842. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1212806109. View

4.
Das N, Kumar T . Molecular regulation of follicle-stimulating hormone synthesis, secretion and action. J Mol Endocrinol. 2018; 60(3):R131-R155. PMC: 5851872. DOI: 10.1530/JME-17-0308. View

5.
Ferlin A, Selice R, Di Mambro A, Ghezzi M, Di Nisio A, Caretta N . Role of vitamin D levels and vitamin D supplementation on bone mineral density in Klinefelter syndrome. Osteoporos Int. 2015; 26(8):2193-202. DOI: 10.1007/s00198-015-3136-8. View