» Articles » PMID: 35988835

Value of Non-Gaussian Diffusion Imaging with a Fractional Order Calculus Model Combined with Conventional MRI for Differentiating Histological Types of Cervical Cancer

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Radiology
Date 2022 Aug 21
PMID 35988835
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the value of a fractional order calculus (FROC) model combined with conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for differentiating cervical adenocarcinoma (CAC) from squamous cell carcinoma (SCC).

Methods: Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with 9 b values (0-2000s/mm) was carried out in 57 cervical cancer patients. Diffusion coefficient (D), fractional order parameter (β), and microstructural quantity (μ) together with apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) were calculated and compared between the CAC and SCC groups. Conventional MRI features included TWI signal intensity (SI), unenhanced-TWI SI, enhanced-TWI SI, and ∆TWI SI, which were also compared between the two groups. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was employed to assess the performance of FROC parameters, ADC, and conventional MRI features in differentiating CAC from SCC.

Results: β was significantly lower in the CAC group than in the SCC group (0.682 ± 0.054 vs. 0.723 ± 0.084, P = 0.035), while D and μ were not significantly different between the two groups (D, P = 0.171; μ, P = 0.127). There was no significant difference in the ADC value between the two groups (P = 0.053). In conventional MRI features, enhanced-TWI SI was significantly higher in the SCC group than in the CAC group (985.78 ± 130.83 vs. 853.92 ± 149.65, P = 0.002). The area under the curve (AUC) of β, ADC, and enhanced-TWI SI was 0.700, 0.683, and 0.799, respectively. The combination of β, ADC, and enhanced-TWI SI revealed optimal diagnostic performance in differentiating CAC from SCC (AUC = 0.930), followed by β + enhanced-TWI SI (AUC = 0.869), ADC+ enhanced-TWI SI (AUC = 0.817), and β + ADC (AUC = 0.761).

Conclusion: The FROC model can serve as a noninvasive and quantitative imaging technique for differentiating CAC from SCC. β combined with ADC and enhanced-TWI SI had the highest diagnostic efficiency.

Citing Articles

Differentiation of early-stage endometrial carcinoma from benign endometrial lesions: a comparative study of six diffusion models.

Bi Q, Deng Y, Xu N, Wu S, Zhang H, Huang Y Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2025; 15(1):121-134.

PMID: 39839005 PMC: 11744118. DOI: 10.21037/qims-24-896.


Value of fractional-order calculus (FROC) model diffusion-weighted imaging combined with simultaneous multi-slice (SMS) acceleration technology for evaluating benign and malignant breast lesions.

Wang F, Sun Y, Zhang B, Yang Q, He A, Xu W BMC Med Imaging. 2024; 24(1):190.

PMID: 39075336 PMC: 11285176. DOI: 10.1186/s12880-024-01368-4.


Whole-tumor histogram analysis of multiple non-Gaussian diffusion models at high b values for assessing cervical cancer.

Yang L, Hu H, Yang X, Yan Z, Shi G, Yang L Abdom Radiol (NY). 2024; 49(7):2513-2524.

PMID: 38995401 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-024-04486-3.


Multiple diffusion models for predicting pathologic response of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Bai B, Cui L, Chu F, Wang Z, Zhao K, Wang S Abdom Radiol (NY). 2024; 49(12):4216-4226.

PMID: 38954001 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-024-04474-7.