» Articles » PMID: 35983705

Retrospective Clinical Evaluation of Subgingival Composite Resin Restorations with Deep-Margin Elevation

Overview
Journal J Adhes Dent
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2022 Aug 19
PMID 35983705
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the long-term clinical quality of subgingivally placed composite resin restorations and the inflammatory status of surrounding supracrestal gingival and periodontal tissues.

Materials And Methods: Patients with at least one subgingival restoration with deep-margin elevation placed between 2010 and 2020 at Heidelberg University Hospital and Tübingen University Hospital were identified. A sound tooth was used as control. Intraoral examination including probing depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL), bleeding on probing (BOP), gingival bleeding index (GBI), and plaque control record (PCR) was conducted. The clinical quality of the restorations was evaluated using the modified FDI criteria. For comparison between control and test teeth, a logistic mixed-effects model was used for GBI, PCR, and BOP, while a linear mixed-effects model was used for CAL. Multivariable linear and logistic regressions were used to examine the influence of smoking, age of restoration, number of decayed, missing and filled teeth, use of interdental brushes, and CAL.

Results: Sixty-three patients were included in the study. The mean age of the restorations was 2.70 ± 1.90 years. There were no significant differences between test and control teeth with respect to inflammatory parameters BOP, GBI, and PCR. CAL was significantly higher in test teeth than in controls (p = 0.027). The regression models revealed that CAL has a significant influence on GBI (p = 0.008) and BOP (p < 0.001). A significantly increased GBI occurred especially on test teeth in patients who did not use interdental brushes daily (p = 0.010). The clinical quality of restorations was rated excellent or good in 70%, an no restoration was rated unacceptable.

Conclusion: No increased inflammation was observed on sites with subgingivally placed composite restorations over an observation period of approximately 3 years. Regular interdental brush use was associated with less gingival inflammation.

Citing Articles

Deep margin elevation; Indications and periodontal considerations.

Alizadeh Oskoee P, Dibazar S J Adv Periodontol Implant Dent. 2025; 16(2):91-93.

PMID: 39758271 PMC: 11699262. DOI: 10.34172/japid.2024.024.


Periodontal health in teeth treated with deep-margin-elevation and CAD/CAM partial lithium disilicate restorations-a prospective controlled trial.

Hausdorfer T, Lechte C, Kanzow P, Rodig T, Wiegand A Clin Oral Investig. 2024; 28(12):670.

PMID: 39613879 PMC: 11606998. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-024-06053-y.


Enhancing subgingival margin restoration: a comprehensive review and meta-analysis of deep margin elevation's impact on microleakage.

Sadeghnezhad P, Sarraf Shirazi A, Borouziniat A, Majidinia S, Soltaninezhad P, Nejat A Evid Based Dent. 2024; 25(4):212.

PMID: 38907025 DOI: 10.1038/s41432-024-01028-0.


Deep Margin Elevation - A Retrospective Clinical Study.

El-Maaita A, Radwan H, Al-Rababah M J Adhes Dent. 2024; 26():117-124.

PMID: 38602235 PMC: 11740768. DOI: 10.3290/j.jad.b5199089.


Relationship between Deep Marginal Elevation and Periodontal Parameters: A Systematic Review.

Felemban M, Khattak O, Alsharari T, Alzahrani A, Ganji K, Iqbal A Medicina (Kaunas). 2023; 59(11).

PMID: 38003997 PMC: 10673413. DOI: 10.3390/medicina59111948.


References
1.
Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang A . Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods. 2009; 41(4):1149-60. DOI: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149. View

2.
Felippe L, Monteiro Junior S, Vieira L, Araujo E . Reestablishing biologic width with forced eruption. Quintessence Int. 2003; 34(10):733-8. View

3.
Vertolli T, Martinsen B, Hanson C, Howard R, Kooistra S, Ye L . Effect of Deep Margin Elevation on CAD/CAM-Fabricated Ceramic Inlays. Oper Dent. 2020; 45(6):608-617. DOI: 10.2341/18-315-L. View

4.
McLean J, Powis D, Prosser H, Wilson A . The use of glass-ionomer cements in bonding composite resins to dentine. Br Dent J. 1985; 158(11):410-4. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4805621. View

5.
Eichelsbacher F, Denner W, Klaiber B, Schlagenhauf U . Periodontal status of teeth with crown-root fractures: results two years after adhesive fragment reattachment. J Clin Periodontol. 2009; 36(10):905-11. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01458.x. View