» Articles » PMID: 3598311

Internal Sphincter-saving in Imperforate Anus with or Without Fistula. A Manometric Study

Overview
Date 1986 Jan 1
PMID 3598311
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Manometric assessment was performed in 54 infants with congenital ano-rectal anomalies including those with a blindly ending rectum (6 cases) or with an ectopic bowel outlet either in the perineum (25 cases), vulva (8 cases), vagina (8 cases), urethra (5 cases) or bladder (2 cases). Infants with an externally accessible orifice were investigated preoperatively whereas those with an internal orifice or no orifice could only be evaluated after surgical correction. In all operated cases presented, the ectopic rectal opening was preserved together with its surrounding smooth musculature. It was transplanted ventral to the puborectalis sling into the anal dimple if present. A normal functioning internal sphincter was observed in all infants even after transplantation. Anal resting tone was normal in all cases with mean values in the various subgroups ranging from 32 +/- 10 mmHg to 51 +/- 6 mm Hg. Frequency of anal slow pressure wave activity ranged from 11.6 +/- 1.5/min to 15.7 +/- 1.3/min. The recto-anal inhibitory reflex was present in all cases. The term fistula should be reserved for morphologically and physiologically abnormal microscopic communications. Failure to appreciate the presence of a normal internal sphincter may account for poor functional results after surgery. The results demonstrate the importance of preserving the internal sphincter in surgical correction of anorectal anomalies.

Citing Articles

The long-term post-surgical outcome of intermediate anorectal malformation in our department.

Tamura R, Kido M, Nakamura K, Kuwahara T, Hirotani T, Yasui Y Pediatr Surg Int. 2024; 40(1):253.

PMID: 39311969 DOI: 10.1007/s00383-024-05833-7.


Post-Operative Anorectal Manometry in Children following Anorectal Malformation Repair: A Systematic Review.

Evans-Barns H, Tien M, Trajanovska M, Safe M, Hutson J, Dinning P J Clin Med. 2023; 12(7).

PMID: 37048627 PMC: 10094903. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12072543.


Evaluation of outcome of anorectal anomaly in childhood: the role of anorectal manometry and endosonography.

Keshtgar A, Athanasakos E, Clayden G, Ward H Pediatr Surg Int. 2008; 24(8):885-92.

PMID: 18512062 DOI: 10.1007/s00383-008-2181-1.


Surgical repair of vulvar anus in adults.

Rintala R, Luukkonen P, Jarvinen H Int J Colorectal Dis. 1989; 4(4):244-6.

PMID: 2614222 DOI: 10.1007/BF01644990.

References
1.
Duthie H, Watts J . CONTRIBUTION OF THE EXTERNAL ANAL SPHINCTER TO THE PRESSURE ZONE IN THE ANAL CANAL. Gut. 1965; 6:64-8. PMC: 1552243. DOI: 10.1136/gut.6.1.64. View

2.
Holschneider A, HECKER W . Reverse smooth muscle plasty: a new method of treating anorectal incontinence in infants with high anal and rectal atresia. J Pediatr Surg. 1981; 16(6):917-20. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3468(81)80846-9. View

3.
Scott J, SWENSON O . Imperforate anus: results in 63 cases and some anatomic considerations. Ann Surg. 1959; 150:477-87. PMC: 1613419. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-195909000-00012. View

4.
Scharli A, KIESEWETTER W . Imperforate anus: anorectosigmoid pressure studies as a quantitative evaluation of postoperative continence. J Pediatr Surg. 1969; 4(6):694-704. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3468(69)90499-0. View

5.
Hofmann-von Kap-Herr S, Koltai I, Tennant L . Anal sphincter substitute using autologous smooth muscle in a fold-over, half-cylinder, double plasty (SMFD-plasty): a new method of treatment of anorectal incontinence. J Pediatr Surg. 1985; 20(2):134-7. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3468(85)80285-2. View