Genomic Tools for Health: Secondary Findings As Findings to Be Shared

Overview

Journal Genet Med

Publisher Elsevier

Specialty Genetics

Date 2022 Aug 18

PMID 35980380

Authors

Skye A Miner

Morgan Similuk

Leila Jamal

Julie Sapp

Benjamin E Berkman

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Purpose: Whether and how to disclose secondary finding (SF) information to children is ethically debated. Some argue that genetic testing of minors should be limited to preserve the child's future autonomy. Others suggest that disclosure of SFs can occur if it is in the best interests of the child. However, the ways that parents conceptualize and weigh their child's future autonomy against the interests of their child and other family members are unknown.

Methods: To explore how parents understand SF disclosure in the context of their child and other family members' lives, we conducted semistructured interviews with 30 families (40 parents in total). All parents had children who were enrolled in a genetic sequencing protocol that returned results by default.

Results: We found that parents did not routinely conceptualize SFs as distinctive health information. Rather parents saw this information as part of their child's overall health. To make decisions about disclosure, parents weighed their child's ability to understand the SF information and their other family member's need to know.

Conclusion: Because most families desired SF information, we argue that disclosure of SF be reconceptualized to reflect the lived experiences of those who may receive this information.

Citing Articles

Clinically actionable incidental and secondary parental genomic findings after proband exome sequencing: Yield and dilemmas.

Basel-Salmon L, Ruhrman-Shahar N, Orenstein N, Levy M, Lidzbarsky G, Batzir N Genet Med Open. 2024; 1(1):100813.

PMID: 39669250 PMC: 11613716. DOI: 10.1016/j.gimo.2023.100813.

Factors affecting couples' decision making about expanded prenatal cell-free DNA screening.

Mumford K, Hendriks S, Miner S, Huelsnitz C, Wakim P, Berkman B Genet Med Open. 2024; 2.

PMID: 39634380 PMC: 11613822. DOI: 10.1016/j.gimo.2024.101890.

Frequency of actionable secondary findings in 7472 Korean genomes derived from the National Project of Bio Big Data pilot study.

Kim Y, Kim J, Cho H, Park H, Park M Hum Genet. 2023; 142(11):1561-1569.

PMID: 37728764 PMC: 10602966. DOI: 10.1007/s00439-023-02592-8.

Actionability of unanticipated monogenic disease risks in newborn genomic screening: Findings from the BabySeq Project.

Green R, Shah N, Genetti C, Yu T, Zettler B, Uveges M Am J Hum Genet. 2023; 110(7):1034-1045.

PMID: 37279760 PMC: 10357495. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2023.05.007.

Framing the Family: A Qualitative Exploration of Factors That Shape Family-Level Experience of Pediatric Genomic Sequencing.

Smith H, Bonkowski E, Hickingbotham M, Deloge R, Pereira S Children (Basel). 2023; 10(5).

PMID: 37238322 PMC: 10217651. DOI: 10.3390/children10050774.

References

Meiser B, Gleeson M, Tucker K . Psychological impact of genetic testing for adult-onset disorders. An update for clinicians. Med J Aust. 2000; 172(3):126-9. View

Parker M . Genetic testing in children and young people. Fam Cancer. 2009; 9(1):15-8. DOI: 10.1007/s10689-009-9272-6. View

McGowan M, Prows C, DeJonckheere M, Brinkman W, Vaughn L, Myers M . Adolescent and Parental Attitudes About Return of Genomic Research Results: Focus Group Findings Regarding Decisional Preferences. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2018; 13(4):371-382. PMC: 6146016. DOI: 10.1177/1556264618776613. View

Miller D, Lee K, Chung W, Gordon A, Herman G, Klein T . ACMG SF v3.0 list for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing: a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG). Genet Med. 2021; 23(8):1381-1390. DOI: 10.1038/s41436-021-01172-3. View

Mand C, Gillam L, Duncan R, Delatycki M . "It was the missing piece": adolescent experiences of predictive genetic testing for adult-onset conditions. Genet Med. 2013; 15(8):643-9. DOI: 10.1038/gim.2013.15. View

Kotila L, Schoppe-Sullivan S, Kamp Dush C . Time in Parenting Activities in Dual-Earner Families at the Transition to Parenthood. Fam Relat. 2015; 62(5):795-807. PMC: 4578481. DOI: 10.1111/fare.12037. View

Borry P, Goffin T, Nys H, Dierickx K . Predictive genetic testing in minors for adult-onset genetic diseases. Mt Sinai J Med. 2008; 75(3):287-96. DOI: 10.1002/msj.20038. View

Duncan R . Predictive genetic testing in young people: when is it appropriate?. J Paediatr Child Health. 2004; 40(11):593-5. DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1754.2004.00481.x. View

Wakefield C, Hanlon L, Tucker K, Patenaude A, Signorelli C, McLoone J . The psychological impact of genetic information on children: a systematic review. Genet Med. 2016; 18(8):755-62. DOI: 10.1038/gim.2015.181. View

10.

Mand C, Gillam L, Delatycki M, Duncan R . Predictive genetic testing in minors for late-onset conditions: a chronological and analytical review of the ethical arguments. J Med Ethics. 2012; 38(9):519-24. DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2011-100055. View

11.

Miller D, Lee K, Gordon A, Amendola L, Adelman K, Bale S . Recommendations for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing, 2021 update: a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG). Genet Med. 2021; 23(8):1391-1398. DOI: 10.1038/s41436-021-01171-4. View

12.

Sapp J, Dong D, Stark C, Ivey L, Hooker G, Biesecker L . Parental attitudes, values, and beliefs toward the return of results from exome sequencing in children. Clin Genet. 2013; 85(2):120-6. PMC: 3930614. DOI: 10.1111/cge.12254. View

13.

ANDERSON J, Meyn M, Shuman C, Zlotnik Shaul R, Mantella L, Szego M . Parents perspectives on whole genome sequencing for their children: qualified enthusiasm?. J Med Ethics. 2016; 43(8):535-539. DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2016-103564. View

14.

McConkie-Rosell A, Spiridigliozzi G . "Family matters": a conceptual framework for genetic testing in children. J Genet Couns. 2009; 13(1):9-29. DOI: 10.1023/b:jogc.0000013379.90587.ef. View

15.

Clayton E, McCullough L, Biesecker L, Joffe S, Friedman Ross L, Wolf S . Addressing the ethical challenges in genetic testing and sequencing of children. Am J Bioeth. 2014; 14(3):3-9. PMC: 3950962. DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2013.879945. View

16.

Tibben A, Dondorp W, Cornelis C, Knoers N, Brilstra E, van Summeren M . Parents, their children, whole exome sequencing and unsolicited findings: growing towards the child's future autonomy. Eur J Hum Genet. 2021; 29(6):911-919. PMC: 8187412. DOI: 10.1038/s41431-020-00794-6. View

17.

Savulescu J . Predictive genetic testing in children. Med J Aust. 2001; 175(7):379-81. DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2001.tb143625.x. View

18.

. Ethical and policy issues in genetic testing and screening of children. Pediatrics. 2013; 131(3):620-2. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2012-3680. View

19.

Wade C, Wilfond B, McBride C . Effects of genetic risk information on children's psychosocial wellbeing: a systematic review of the literature. Genet Med. 2010; 12(6):317-26. DOI: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181de695c. View

20.

McCullough L, Brothers K, Chung W, Joffe S, Koenig B, Wilfond B . Professionally Responsible Disclosure of Genomic Sequencing Results in Pediatric Practice. Pediatrics. 2015; 136(4):e974-82. PMC: 4586726. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2015-0624. View