[Development and Clinical Application of Robot-assisted Technology in Traumatic Orthopedics]

Overview

Journal Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi

Specialty General Surgery

Date 2022 Aug 18

PMID 35979779

Authors

Zhenzhong Zhu

Guoyan Zheng

Changqing Zhang

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objective: To review and evaluate the basic principles and advantages of orthopedic robot-assisted technology, research progress, clinical applications, and limitations in the field of traumatic orthopedics, especially in fracture reduction robots.

Methods: An extensive review of research literature on the principles of robot-assisted technology and fracture reduction robots was conducted to analyze the technical advantages and clinical efficacy and shortcomings, and to discuss the future development trends in this field.

Results: Orthopedic surgical robots can assist orthopedists in intuitive preoperative planning, precise intraoperative control, and minimally invasive operations. It greatly expands the ability of doctors to evaluate and treat orthopedic trauma. Trauma orthopedic surgery robot has achieved a breakthrough from basic research to clinical application, and the preliminary results show that the technology can significantly improve surgical precision and reduce surgical trauma. However, there are still problems such as insufficient evaluation of effectiveness, limited means of technology realization, and narrow clinical indications that need to be solved.

Conclusion: Robot-assisted technology has a broad application prospect in traumatic orthopedics, but the current development is still in the initial stage. It is necessary to strengthen the cooperative medical-industrial research, the construction of doctors' communication platform, standardized training and data sharing in order to continuously promote the development of robot-assisted technology in traumatic orthopedics and better play its clinical application value.

Citing Articles

Preoperative 3D printing planning technology combined with orthopedic surgical robot-assisted minimally invasive screw fixation for the treatment of pelvic fractures: a retrospective study.

Jing Y, Chang L, Cong B, Wang J, Chen M, Tang Z PeerJ. 2024; 12:e18632.

PMID: 39677955 PMC: 11646416. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.18632.

[Study of heat steam induced skin damage prevention in robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction using Da Vinci Robot].

Chen K, Lu P Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2024; 38(7):813-817.

PMID: 39013817 PMC: 11252685. DOI: 10.7507/1002-1892.202404067.

[Comparative study of orthopaedic robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery and open surgery for limb osteoid osteoma].

Feng J, Liang W, Wang Y, Tang Z, A M, Xu B Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2024; 38(1):40-45.

PMID: 38225839 PMC: 10796222. DOI: 10.7507/1002-1892.202310067.

[Effectiveness of robot-guided percutaneous fixation and decompression via small incision for advanced thoracolumbar metastases].

Li J, Lin S, Tang L, Hu J, Wan L, Zhang K Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2023; 37(9):1113-1118.

PMID: 37718424 PMC: 10505639. DOI: 10.7507/1002-1892.202305040.

The Use of Sports Rehabilitation Robotics to Assist in the Recovery of Physical Abilities in Elderly Patients with Degenerative Diseases: A Literature Review.

Ju F, Wang Y, Xie B, Mi Y, Zhao M, Cao J Healthcare (Basel). 2023; 11(3).

PMID: 36766901 PMC: 9914201. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11030326.

References

Lan H, Tan Z, Li K, Gao J, Liu T . Intramedullary Nail Fixation Assisted by Orthopaedic Robot Navigation for Intertrochanteric Fractures in Elderly Patients. Orthop Surg. 2019; 11(2):255-262. PMC: 6594474. DOI: 10.1111/os.12447. View

Morelli L, Guadagni S, Di Franco G, Palmeri M, Di Candio G, Mosca F . Da Vinci single site© surgical platform in clinical practice: a systematic review. Int J Med Robot. 2015; 12(4):724-734. DOI: 10.1002/rcs.1713. View

Bargar W, Parise C, Hankins A, Marlen N, Campanelli V, Netravali N . Fourteen Year Follow-Up of Randomized Clinical Trials of Active Robotic-Assisted Total Hip Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2017; 33(3):810-814. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.09.066. View

Pflugi S, Liu L, M Ecker T, Schumann S, Cullmann J, Siebenrock K . A cost-effective surgical navigation solution for periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) surgery. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2015; 11(2):271-80. DOI: 10.1007/s11548-015-1267-1. View

Redmond J, Gupta A, Hammarstedt J, Petrakos A, Stake C, Domb B . Accuracy of Component Placement in Robotic-Assisted Total Hip Arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 2016; 39(3):193-9. DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20160404-06. View

Reb C, Berlet G . Experience with Navigation in Total Ankle Arthroplasty. Is It Worth the Cost?. Foot Ankle Clin. 2017; 22(2):455-463. DOI: 10.1016/j.fcl.2017.01.011. View

Kayani B, Konan S, Pietrzak J, Haddad F . Iatrogenic Bone and Soft Tissue Trauma in Robotic-Arm Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty Compared With Conventional Jig-Based Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Cohort Study and Validation of a New Classification System. J Arthroplasty. 2018; 33(8):2496-2501. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.03.042. View

Maeda Y, Sugano N, Saito M, Yonenobu K, Sakuma I, Nakajima Y . Robot-assisted femoral fracture reduction: preliminary study in patients and healthy volunteers. Comput Aided Surg. 2008; 13(3):148-56. DOI: 10.3109/10929080802031038. View

Li C, Wang T, Hu L, Zhang L, Du H, Zhao L . A visual servo-based teleoperation robot system for closed diaphyseal fracture reduction. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2015; 229(9):629-37. DOI: 10.1177/0954411915595827. View

10.

Seide K, Wolter D . [Corrections using the hexapod]. Orthopade. 2000; 29(1):39-46. DOI: 10.1007/s001320050005. View

11.

Kwoh Y, Hou J, Jonckheere E, Hayati S . A robot with improved absolute positioning accuracy for CT guided stereotactic brain surgery. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1988; 35(2):153-60. DOI: 10.1109/10.1354. View

12.

Lei Y, Fu Y, Wang T, Liu Y, Patel P, Curran W . 4D-CT deformable image registration using multiscale unsupervised deep learning. Phys Med Biol. 2020; 65(8):085003. PMC: 7775640. DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab79c4. View

13.

Bozkurt M, Apaydin N, Isik C, Bilgetekin Y, Acar H, Elhan A . Robotic arthroscopic surgery: a new challenge in arthroscopic surgery Part-I: Robotic shoulder arthroscopy; a cadaveric feasibility study. Int J Med Robot. 2011; 7(4):496-500. DOI: 10.1002/rcs.436. View

14.

Boylan M, Suchman K, Vigdorchik J, Slover J, Bosco J . Technology-Assisted Hip and Knee Arthroplasties: An Analysis of Utilization Trends. J Arthroplasty. 2018; 33(4):1019-1023. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.11.033. View

15.

Bargar W . Robots in orthopaedic surgery: past, present, and future. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007; 463:31-6. View

16.

Liu H, Duan S, Liu S, Jia F, Zhu L, Liu M . Robot-assisted percutaneous screw placement combined with pelvic internal fixator for minimally invasive treatment of unstable pelvic ring fractures. Int J Med Robot. 2018; 14(5):e1927. PMC: 6175104. DOI: 10.1002/rcs.1927. View

17.

Tang P, Hu L, Du H, Gong M, Zhang L . Novel 3D hexapod computer-assisted orthopaedic surgery system for closed diaphyseal fracture reduction. Int J Med Robot. 2011; 8(1):17-24. DOI: 10.1002/rcs.417. View

18.

Dagnino G, Georgilas I, Tarassoli P, Atkins R, Dogramadzi S . Vision-based real-time position control of a semi-automated system for robot-assisted joint fracture surgery. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2015; 11(3):437-55. DOI: 10.1007/s11548-015-1296-9. View

19.

Chang J, Kayani B, Wallace C, Haddad F . Functional alignment achieves soft-tissue balance in total knee arthroplasty as measured with quantitative sensor-guided technology. Bone Joint J. 2021; 103-B(3):507-514. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.103B.BJJ-2020-0940.R1. View

20.

Nolte L, Zamorano L, Jiang Z, Wang Q, Langlotz F, Berlemann U . Image-guided insertion of transpedicular screws. A laboratory set-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995; 20(4):497-500. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199502001-00016. View