» Articles » PMID: 35978417

An Analysis of COVID-19 Information Sources

Overview
Date 2022 Aug 17
PMID 35978417
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has brought new situations that require the effective delivery of health information across the world and it's important to offer clear, consistent, and credible information on the pandemic to mitigate and control the outbreak.

Aim: To assess COVID-19 information source, need and trust among the rural community of southwest Ethiopia.

Methods: A community-based cross-sectional study design was conducted among 634 rural communities of southwest Ethiopia. The data were collected by interviewing individuals from selected households and analyzed by SPSS version 26. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to assess factors affecting information needs.

Results: Radio 484 (76.3%) was mostly used as a source of information for COVID-19, and government 404 (63.7%) and health professionals 345 (57.7%) were trusted. However, only 10 (1.6%) of the participants acquired information from health professionals. Around 395 (62.3%) of the participants needed additional information on COVID-19. Around 230 (58.2%) and 186 (47.1%) of the participants required additional information on cause and sign and symptoms, respectively. Age of < 45 years old (AOR: 2.11, 95% CI: 1.43, 3.12, P < 0.001), and absence of formal education (AOR: 2.00, 95% CI: 1.35, 2.95, P: 0.001) were factors positively affecting the information needs of the participants on COVID-19. Church goers (AOR: 3.24; 95% CI: 2.03, 5.19; P < 0.001), television (AOR: 2.39; 95% CI: 1.63, 3.49; P < 0.001) and social media users (AOR: 4.52; 95% CI: 2.26, 9.04; P < 0.001) as source of information required additional information on COVID-19, and the participants that trusted social media (AOR: 2.52; 95% CI: 1.64, 3.87; P < 0.001) and friends/relatives (AOR: 2.95: 95% CI: 1.51, 5.76; P < 0.001) were also required additional information on COVID-19.

Conclusions: The popular sources of COVID-19-related information were radio and television. The participants trusted the government and health professionals on COVID-19. However, less than 2% of the participants had information from health professionals. The majority of the participants wanted to learn more about COVID-19. The areas the participants required additional information include cause and signs and symptoms. Age, educational status, trust in social media, trust in friends, using the church, television and social media as a source were factors associated with information needs.

Citing Articles

Palestinian university students' perspectives on COVID-19 risk and remote learning during the pandemic: A qualitative photovoice study.

Sarhan M, Basha H, Giacaman R, Jimba M, Fujiya R PLoS One. 2024; 19(10):e0311972.

PMID: 39392814 PMC: 11469486. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311972.


Factors Associated to Community Practices Toward the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Study in Indonesia.

Trisyani Y, Emaliyawati E, Nuraeni A, Mirwanti R, Ibrahim K, Pramukti I J Multidiscip Healthc. 2024; 17:1901-1912.

PMID: 38706508 PMC: 11067927. DOI: 10.2147/JMDH.S455396.


Use of the socio-ecological model to explore trusted sources of COVID-19 information in Black and Latinx communities in Michigan.

Carmona G, Sawant K, Hamasha R, Cross F, Woolford S, Buyuktur A J Commun Healthc. 2023; 16(4):389-400.

PMID: 37942823 PMC: 10872920. DOI: 10.1080/17538068.2023.2277499.


Canadian public perceptions and experiences with information during the COVID-19 pandemic: strategies to optimize future risk communications.

Theivendrampillai S, Cooper J, Lee T, Lau M, Marquez C, Straus S BMC Public Health. 2023; 23(1):796.

PMID: 37118761 PMC: 10141811. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-023-15659-y.


Healthcare Workers' Attitudes towards Mandatory COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Politis M, Sotiriou S, Doxani C, Stefanidis I, Zintzaras E, Rachiotis G Vaccines (Basel). 2023; 11(4).

PMID: 37112791 PMC: 10142794. DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11040880.


References
1.
Valizadeh-Haghi S, Khazaal Y, Rahmatizadeh S . Health websites on COVID-19: are they readable and credible enough to help public self-care?. J Med Libr Assoc. 2021; 109(1):75-83. PMC: 7772974. DOI: 10.5195/jmla.2021.1020. View

2.
Lin Y, Liu C, Chiu Y . Google searches for the keywords of "wash hands" predict the speed of national spread of COVID-19 outbreak among 21 countries. Brain Behav Immun. 2020; 87:30-32. PMC: 7151250. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbi.2020.04.020. View

3.
Adamy A, Rani H . An evaluation of community satisfaction with the government's COVID-19 pandemic response in Aceh, Indonesia. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 2021; 69:102723. PMC: 8649176. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102723. View

4.
Desalegn Z, Deyessa N, Teka B, Shiferaw W, Hailemariam D, Addissie A . COVID-19 and the public response: Knowledge, attitude and practice of the public in mitigating the pandemic in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. PLoS One. 2021; 16(1):e0244780. PMC: 7790293. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244780. View

5.
Walter D, Bohmer M, Reiter S, Krause G, Wichmann O . Risk perception and information-seeking behaviour during the 2009/10 influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 pandemic in Germany. Euro Surveill. 2012; 17(13). View