» Articles » PMID: 35977275

Association of Hospital Interoperable Data Sharing With Alternative Payment Model Participation

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Importance: Interoperable patient data exchange across hospitals remains an important policy goal for reducing costs and improving the quality of care. Congress designated 2018 as the goal for nationwide interoperability, and policy makers hoped that aligning financial incentives via alternative payment models (APMs) would help achieve that goal.

Objective: To measure interoperability progress since 2014, assess the association between alternative payment model participation and hospital engagement in interoperable data sharing from 2014 to 2018, and evaluate hospital-reported barriers to interoperability in 2018.

Design Setting And Participants: This cohort study included nonfederal acute care hospitals in the US from January 2014 to December 2018 that responded to the American Hospital Association Annual Survey. Data were analyzed from October 2019 through March 2021.

Exposures: Participation in an APM, including accountable care organizations, bundled payments, or patient-centered medical homes.

Main Outcomes And Measures: Hospital engagement in all 4 domains of interoperability: finding/querying for data, sending data electronically, receiving data electronically, and integrating electronic patient data from external care delivery organizations.

Results: The sample included 3928 hospitals in the US from January 2014 to December 2018. Progress across interoperability domains was uneven, 2430 (88.3%) hospitals sending and 2115 (76.9%) receiving patient data electronically in 2018. However, only 1249 (45.4%) hospitals engaged in all 4 domains of interoperability in 2018, and growth between 2014 and 2018 was slow. There was no evidence that participation in APMs was associated with interoperability, with multivariate models suggesting that participation in an APM was associated with only a non-statistically significant 1-percentage point increase in interoperability engagement (β = 0.01; 95% CI, -0.01 to 0.03). The most commonly cited barrier to interoperability was challenges associated with sharing data across different electronic health record vendors.

Conclusions And Relevance: In this cohort study of hospital interoperability, fewer than half of US hospitals were engaged in interoperable data exchange in 2018. There was no observable evidence that hospital APM participation was associated with interoperability engagement. Many hospitals report technical and governance challenges to data sharing that are unlikely to be addressed by the alignment of financial incentives alone.

Citing Articles

New indices to track interoperability among US hospitals.

Strawley C, Adler-Milstein J, Holmgren A, Everson J J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024; 32(2):318-327.

PMID: 39724921 PMC: 11756636. DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocae289.


Differences in Primary Care Follow-up After Acute Care Discharge Within and Across Health Systems: a Retrospective Cohort Study.

Anderson T, ODonoghue A, Herzig S, Cohen M, Aung N, Dechen T J Gen Intern Med. 2024; 39(8):1431-1437.

PMID: 38228989 PMC: 11169150. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-024-08610-3.


Health Information Exchange: Understanding the Policy Landscape and Future of Data Interoperability.

Holmgren A, Esdar M, Husers J, Coutinho-Almeida J Yearb Med Inform. 2023; 32(1):184-194.

PMID: 37414031 PMC: 10751121. DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1768719.


Experiences with information blocking in the United States: a national survey of hospitals.

Everson J, Healy D, Patel V J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023; 30(6):1150-1157.

PMID: 37029919 PMC: 10198516. DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocad060.


Perspectives on Challenges and Opportunities for Interoperability: Findings From Key Informant Interviews With Stakeholders in Ohio.

Walker D, Tarver W, Jonnalagadda P, Ranbom L, Ford E, Rahurkar S JMIR Med Inform. 2023; 11:e43848.

PMID: 36826979 PMC: 10007006. DOI: 10.2196/43848.

References
1.
Zhou Y, Ancker J, Upadhye M, McGeorge N, Guarrera T, Hegde S . The impact of interoperability of electronic health records on ambulatory physician practices: a discrete-event simulation study. Inform Prim Care. 2014; 21(1):21-9. DOI: 10.14236/jhi.v21i1.36. View

2.
Everson J, Adler-Milstein J . Engagement In Hospital Health Information Exchange Is Associated With Vendor Marketplace Dominance. Health Aff (Millwood). 2016; 35(7):1286-93. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1215. View

3.
Blumenthal D . Launching HITECH. N Engl J Med. 2010; 362(5):382-5. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp0912825. View

4.
McWilliams J . Cost Containment and the Tale of Care Coordination. N Engl J Med. 2016; 375(23):2218-2220. PMC: 5506340. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp1610821. View

5.
Chen M, Guo S, Tan X . Does Health Information Exchange Improve Patient Outcomes? Empirical Evidence From Florida Hospitals. Health Aff (Millwood). 2019; 38(2):197-204. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05447. View