» Articles » PMID: 35972742

Efficacy of a Commercial Weight Management Program Compared With a Do-It-Yourself Approach: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Abstract

Importance: Given the prevalence of obesity, accessible and effective treatment options are needed to manage obesity and its comorbid conditions. Commercial weight management programs are a potential solution to the lack of available treatment, providing greater access at lower cost than clinic-based approaches, but few commercial programs have been rigorously evaluated.

Objective: To compare the differences in weight change between individuals randomly assigned to a commercial weight management program and those randomly assigned to a do-it-yourself (DIY) approach.

Design, Setting, And Participants: This 1-year, randomized clinical trial conducted in the United States, Canada, and United Kingdom between June 19, 2018, and November 30, 2019, enrolled 373 adults aged 18 to 75 years with a body mass index (BMI; calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared) of 25 to 45. Assessors were blinded to treatment conditions.

Interventions: A widely available commercial weight management program that included reduced requirements for dietary self-monitoring and recommendations for a variety of DIY approaches to weight loss.

Main Outcomes And Measures: The primary outcomes were the difference in weight change between the 2 groups at 3 and 12 months. The a priori hypothesis was that the commercial program would result in greater weight loss than the DIY approach at 3 and 12 months. Analyses were performed on an intention-to-treat basis.

Results: The study include 373 participants (272 women [72.9%]; mean [SD] BMI, 33.8 [5.2]; 77 [20.6%] aged 18-34 years, 74 [19.8%] aged 35-43 years, 82 [22.0%] aged 44-52 years, and 140 [37.5%] aged 53-75 years). At 12 months, retention rates were 88.8% (166 of 187) for the commercial weight management program group and 95.7% (178 of 186) for the DIY group. At 3 months, participants in the commercial program had a mean (SD) weight loss of -3.8 (4.1) kg vs -1.8 (3.7) kg among those in the DIY group. At 12 months, participants in the commercial program had a mean (SD) weight loss of -4.4 (7.3) kg vs -1.7 (7.3) kg among those in the DIY group. The mean difference between groups was -2.0 kg (97.5% CI, -2.9 to -1.1 kg) at 3 months (P < .001) and -2.6 kg (97.5% CI, -4.3 to -0.8 kg) at 12 months (P < .001). A greater percentage of participants in the commercial program group than participants in the DIY group achieved loss of 5% of body weight at both 3 months (40.7% [72 of 177] vs 18.6% [34 of 183]) and 12 months (42.8% [71 of 166] vs 24.7% [44 of 178]).

Conclusions And Relevance: Adults randomly assigned to a commercial weight management program with reduced requirements for dietary self-monitoring lost more weight and were more likely to achieve weight loss of 5% at 3 and 12 months than adults following a DIY approach. This study contributes data on the efficacy of commercial weight management programs and DIY weight management approaches.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03571893.

Citing Articles

Weight Loss Patterns and Outcomes Over 12 Months on a Commercial Weight Management Program (CSIRO Total Wellbeing Diet Online): Large-Community Cohort Evaluation Study.

Hendrie G, Baird D, James-Martin G, Brindal E, Brooker P J Med Internet Res. 2025; 27:e65122.

PMID: 39813669 PMC: 11780285. DOI: 10.2196/65122.


Long-Term Weight Loss Outcomes in a Virtual Weight Care Clinic Prescribing a Broad Range of Medications Alongside Behavior Change.

Clark J, Smith B, Juusola J, Kumar R Obes Sci Pract. 2025; 11(1):e70036.

PMID: 39790443 PMC: 11711220. DOI: 10.1002/osp4.70036.


Real-World Outcomes of a Digital Behavioral Coaching Intervention to Improve Employee Health Status: Retrospective Observational Study.

Abdul Aziz A, Ong T JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2024; 12():e50356.

PMID: 39255013 PMC: 11422728. DOI: 10.2196/50356.


Impact of a digital employer-based weight loss program on individuals age 65 or older.

Rogers R, Doherty M, Jones D, Jakicic J, Church T Front Aging. 2024; 5:1337418.

PMID: 38841343 PMC: 11150599. DOI: 10.3389/fragi.2024.1337418.


Functional medicine health coaching improved elimination diet compliance and patient-reported health outcomes: Results from a randomized controlled trial.

DAdamo C, Kaplan M, Campbell P, McLaughlin K, Swartz J, Wattles K Medicine (Baltimore). 2024; 103(8):e37148.

PMID: 38394515 PMC: 11309605. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000037148.


References
1.
Wing R, Phelan S . Long-term weight loss maintenance. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005; 82(1 Suppl):222S-225S. DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/82.1.222S. View

2.
Acharya S, Elci O, Sereika S, Music E, Styn M, Turk M . Adherence to a behavioral weight loss treatment program enhances weight loss and improvements in biomarkers. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2009; 3:151-60. PMC: 2778406. DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s5802. View

3.
Buysse D, Reynolds 3rd C, Monk T, BERMAN S, Kupfer D . The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Res. 1989; 28(2):193-213. DOI: 10.1016/0165-1781(89)90047-4. View

4.
Knowler W, Fowler S, Hamman R, Christophi C, Hoffman H, Brenneman A . 10-year follow-up of diabetes incidence and weight loss in the Diabetes Prevention Program Outcomes Study. Lancet. 2009; 374(9702):1677-86. PMC: 3135022. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61457-4. View

5.
Magkos F, Fraterrigo G, Yoshino J, Luecking C, Kirbach K, Kelly S . Effects of Moderate and Subsequent Progressive Weight Loss on Metabolic Function and Adipose Tissue Biology in Humans with Obesity. Cell Metab. 2016; 23(4):591-601. PMC: 4833627. DOI: 10.1016/j.cmet.2016.02.005. View