» Articles » PMID: 35969424

Impact of a Personal Health Record Intervention Upon Surveillance Among Colorectal Cancer Survivors: Feasibility Study

Overview
Journal JMIR Cancer
Publisher JMIR Publications
Specialty Oncology
Date 2022 Aug 15
PMID 35969424
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: There are currently an estimated 1.5 million individuals living in the United States with colorectal cancer (CRC), and although the 5-year survival rate has increased, survivors are at risk for recurrence, particularly within the first 2-3 years after treatment. National guidelines recommend continued surveillance after resection to identify recurrence early on. Adherence among survivors ranges from 23% to 94%. Novel interventions are needed to increase CRC survivors' knowledge and confidence in managing their cancer and thus to increase adherence to follow-up surveillance.

Objective: The objective of this study is to develop and test the feasibility and efficacy of a stand-alone, web-based personal health record (PHR) to increase surveillance adherence among CRC survivors, with patient beliefs about surveillance as secondary outcomes.

Methods: A pre- and postintervention feasibility trial was conducted testing the efficacy of the colorectal cancer survivor (CRCS)-PHR, which had been previously developed using an iterative, user-centered design approach.

Results: The average age of the sample was 58 (SD 9.9) years, with 57% (16/28) male and the majority married (20/28, 71%) and employed full-time (15/28, 54%). We observed a significant increase in adherence to colonoscopy (before: 11/21, 52% vs after: 18/21, 86%; P=.005) and CEA (14/21, 67% vs 20/21, 95%; P=.01), as well as a slight increase in CT scans (14/21, 67% vs 18/21, 86%; P=.10). The only significant impact on secondary outcome (patient beliefs) was benefits of CEA test (P=.04), as most of the beliefs were high at baseline.

Conclusions: This feasibility study lays the groundwork for continued development of the CRCS-PHR to increase CRC surveillance. Patient-centered technologies, such as the CRCS-PHR, represent an important potential approach to improving the receipt of guideline-concordant care and follow-up surveillance, and not just for CRC survivors. Researchers should continue to develop patient-centered health technologies with clinician implementation in mind to increase patient self-efficacy and surveillance adherence.

Citing Articles

Advancing cancer care through digital access in the USA: a state-of-the-art review of patient portals in oncology.

Suresh U, Ancker J, Salmi L, Diamond L, Rosenbloom T, Steitz B BMJ Oncol. 2025; 4(1):e000432.

PMID: 40052188 PMC: 11883497. DOI: 10.1136/bmjonc-2024-000432.


Integrated personal health record (PHR) security: requirements and mechanisms.

Hosseini A, Emami H, Sadat Y, Paydar S BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023; 23(1):116.

PMID: 37430242 PMC: 10334660. DOI: 10.1186/s12911-023-02225-0.

References
1.
Rosenstock I . Why people use health services. Milbank Mem Fund Q. 1966; 44(3):Suppl:94-127. View

2.
Primrose J, Perera R, Gray A, Rose P, Fuller A, Corkhill A . Effect of 3 to 5 years of scheduled CEA and CT follow-up to detect recurrence of colorectal cancer: the FACS randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2014; 311(3):263-70. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2013.285718. View

3.
Tapuria A, Porat T, Kalra D, Dsouza G, Xiaohui S, Curcin V . Impact of patient access to their electronic health record: systematic review. Inform Health Soc Care. 2021; 46(2):192-204. DOI: 10.1080/17538157.2021.1879810. View

4.
Luszczynska A, Scholz U, Schwarzer R . The general self-efficacy scale: multicultural validation studies. J Psychol. 2005; 139(5):439-57. DOI: 10.3200/JRLP.139.5.439-457. View

5.
Mols F, Tomalin B, Pearce A, Kaambwa B, Koczwara B . Financial toxicity and employment status in cancer survivors. A systematic literature review. Support Care Cancer. 2020; 28(12):5693-5708. PMC: 7686183. DOI: 10.1007/s00520-020-05719-z. View