» Articles » PMID: 35967967

Linking Multi-media Modeling with Machine Learning to Assess and Predict Lake Chlorophyll Concentrations

Overview
Date 2022 Aug 15
PMID 35967967
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Eutrophication and excessive algal growth pose a threat on aquatic organisms and the health of the public, environment, and the economy. Understanding what drives excessive algal growth can inform mitigation measures and aid in advance planning to minimize impacts. We demonstrate how simulated data from weather, hydrological, and agroecosystem numerical prediction models can be combined with machine learning (ML) to assess and predict Chlorophyll (Chl ) concentrations, a proxy for lake eutrophication and algal biomass. The study area is Lake Erie for a 16-year period, 2002-2017. A total of 20 environmental variables from linked and coupled physical models are used as input features to train the ML model with Chl observations from 16 measuring stations. Included are meteorological variables from the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model, hydrological variables from the Variable Infiltration Capacity (VIC) model, and agricultural management practice variables from the Environmental Policy Integrated Climate (EPIC) agroecosystem model. The consolidation of these variables is conducive to a successful prediction of Chl . Aside from the synergistic effects that weather, hydrology, and fertilizers have on eutrophication and excessive algal growth, we found that the application of different forms of both P and N fertilizers are highly ranked for the prediction of Chl concentration. The developed ML model successfully predicts Chl with a coefficient of determination of 0.81, bias of -0.12 μg/l and RMSE of 4.97 μg/l. The developed ML-based modeling approach can be used for impact assessment of agriculture practices in a changing climate that affect Chl concentrations in Lake Erie.

Citing Articles

A New Approach to Predict Tributary Phosphorus Loads Using Machine Learning- and Physics-Based Modeling Systems.

Chang C, Astitha M, Yuan Y, Tang C, Vlahos P, Garcia V Artif Intell Earth Syst. 2023; 2(3):1-20.

PMID: 37841557 PMC: 10569129. DOI: 10.1175/aies-d-22-0049.1.

References
1.
Spero T, Nolte C, Mallard M, Bowden J . A Maieutic Exploration of Nudging Strategies for Regional Climate Applications Using the WRF Model. J Appl Meteorol Climatol. 2021; 57(8):1883-1906. PMC: 7898162. DOI: 10.1175/jamc-d-17-0360.1. View

2.
Paerl H, Scott J . Throwing fuel on the fire: synergistic effects of excessive nitrogen inputs and global warming on harmful algal blooms. Environ Sci Technol. 2010; 44(20):7756-8. DOI: 10.1021/es102665e. View

3.
Ran L, Yuan Y, Cooter E, Benson V, Yang D, Pleim J . An Integrated Agriculture, Atmosphere, and Hydrology Modeling System for Ecosystem Assessments. J Adv Model Earth Syst. 2021; 11(12):4645-4668. PMC: 8193828. DOI: 10.1029/2019MS001708. View

4.
Schindler D . Eutrophication and recovery in experimental lakes: implications for lake management. Science. 1974; 184(4139):897-9. DOI: 10.1126/science.184.4139.897. View

5.
Gobler C, Burkholder J, Davis T, Harke M, Johengen T, Stow C . The dual role of nitrogen supply in controlling the growth and toxicity of cyanobacterial blooms. Harmful Algae. 2017; 54:87-97. DOI: 10.1016/j.hal.2016.01.010. View