» Articles » PMID: 35967582

Non-myeloablative Conditioning is Sufficient to Achieve Complete Donor Myeloid Chimerism Following Matched Sibling Donor Bone Marrow Transplant for Myeloproliferative Leukemia Virus Oncogene () Mutation-driven Congenital Amegakaryocytic...

Overview
Journal Front Pediatr
Specialty Pediatrics
Date 2022 Aug 15
PMID 35967582
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Congenital amegakaryocytic thrombocytopenia (CAMT) is a rare platelet production disorder caused mainly by loss of function biallelic mutations in myeloproliferative leukemia virus oncogene (), the gene encoding the thrombopoietin receptor (TPOR). Patients with -mutant CAMT are not only at risk for life-threatening bleeding events, but many affected individuals will also ultimately develop bone marrow aplasia owing to the absence of thrombopoietin/TPOR signaling required for maintenance of hematopoietic stem cells. Curative allogeneic stem cell transplant for patients with CAMT has historically used myeloablative conditioning; however, given the inherent stem cell defect in -mutant CAMT, a less intensive regimen may prove equally effective with reduced morbidity, particularly in patients with evolving aplasia.

Methods: We report the case of a 2-year-old boy with -mutant CAMT and bone marrow hypocellularity who underwent matched sibling donor bone marrow transplant (MSD-BMT) using a non-myeloablative regimen consisting of fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and antithymocyte globulin (ATG).

Results: The patient achieved rapid trilinear engraftment and resolution of thrombocytopenia. While initial myeloid donor chimerism was mixed (88% donor), due to the competitive advantage of donor hematopoietic cells, myeloid chimerism increased to 100% by 4 months post-transplant. Donor chimerism and blood counts remained stable through 1-year post-transplant.

Conclusion: This experience suggests that non-myeloablative conditioning is a suitable approach for patients with -mutant CAMT undergoing MSD-BMT and is associated with reduced risks of conditioning-related toxicity compared to traditional myeloablative regimens.

References
1.
Ballmaier M, Germeshausen M, Schulze H, Cherkaoui K, Lang S, Gaudig A . c-mpl mutations are the cause of congenital amegakaryocytic thrombocytopenia. Blood. 2001; 97(1):139-46. DOI: 10.1182/blood.v97.1.139. View

2.
Tarek N, Kernan N, Prockop S, Scaradavou A, Small T, OReilly R . T-cell-depleted hematopoietic SCT from unrelated donors for the treatment of congenital amegakaryocytic thrombocytopenia. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2011; 47(5):744-6. DOI: 10.1038/bmt.2011.142. View

3.
Deeg H, Leisenring W, Storb R, NIMS J, Flowers M, Witherspoon R . Long-term outcome after marrow transplantation for severe aplastic anemia. Blood. 1998; 91(10):3637-45. View

4.
Clark R, Mostoufi-Moab S, Yasui Y, Vu N, Sklar C, Motan T . Predicting acute ovarian failure in female survivors of childhood cancer: a cohort study in the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (CCSS) and the St Jude Lifetime Cohort (SJLIFE). Lancet Oncol. 2020; 21(3):436-445. PMC: 7060129. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30818-6. View

5.
Al-Qahtani F . Congenital amegakaryocytic thrombocytopenia: a brief review of the literature. Clin Med Insights Pathol. 2010; 3:25-30. PMC: 2999995. DOI: 10.4137/cpath.s4972. View