» Articles » PMID: 35966712

The Dynamic Transcriptome During Maturation of Biofilms Formed by Methicillin-resistant

Overview
Journal Front Microbiol
Specialty Microbiology
Date 2022 Aug 15
PMID 35966712
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Methicillin-resistant (MRSA), a leading cause of chronic infections, forms prolific biofilms which afford an escape route from antibiotic treatment and host immunity. However, MRSA clones are genetically diverse, and mechanisms underlying biofilm formation remain under-studied. Such studies form the basis for developing targeted therapeutics. Here, we studied the temporal changes in the biofilm transcriptome of three pandemic MRSA clones: USA300, HEMRSA-15, and ST239.

Methods: Biofilm formation was assessed using a static model with one representative strain per clone. Total RNA was extracted from biofilm and planktonic cultures after 24, 48, and 72 h of growth, followed by rRNA depletion and sequencing (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, United States, NextSeq500, v2, 1 × 75 bp). Differentially expressed gene (DEG) analysis between phenotypes and among early (24 h), intermediate (48 h), and late (72 h) stages of biofilms was performed together with co-expression network construction and compared between clones. To understand the influence of SCC and ACME on biofilm formation, isogenic mutants containing deletions of the entire elements or of single genes therein were constructed in USA300.

Results: Genes involved in primarily core genome-encoded KEGG pathways (transporters and others) were upregulated in 24-h biofilm culture compared to 24-h planktonic culture. However, the number of affected pathways in the ST239 24 h biofilm ( = 11) was remarkably lower than that in USA300/EMRSA-15 biofilms (USA300: = 27, HEMRSA-15: = 58). The gene, which encodes clumping factor A, was the single common DEG identified across the three clones in 24-h biofilm culture (2.2- to 2.66-fold). In intermediate (48 h) and late (72 h) stages of biofilms, decreased expression of central metabolic and fermentative pathways (glycolysis/gluconeogenesis, fatty acid biosynthesis), indicating a shift to anaerobic conditions, was already evident in USA300 and HEMRSA-15 in 48-h biofilm cultures; ST239 showed a similar profile at 72 h. Last, SCC+ACME deletion and disruption negatively affected USA300 biofilm formation.

Conclusion: Our data show striking differences in gene expression during biofilm formation by three of the most important pandemic MRSA clones, USA300, HEMRSA-15, and ST239. The gene was the only significantly upregulated gene across all three strains in 24-h biofilm cultures and exemplifies an important target to disrupt early biofilms. Furthermore, our data indicate a critical role for arginine catabolism pathways in early biofilm formation.

Citing Articles

Comprehensive analysis of antimicrobial resistance, biofilm formation and virulence factors of staphylococci isolated from bovine mastitis.

Moreno J, Diana L, Martinez M, Iribarnegaray V, Puentes R Heliyon. 2025; 11(4):e42749.

PMID: 40066049 PMC: 11891686. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e42749.


Transcriptome and interactome-based analyses to unravel crucial proteins and pathways involved in Acinetobacter baumannii pathogenesis.

Swain A, Senapati S, Pan A Mol Divers. 2024; .

PMID: 39543024 DOI: 10.1007/s11030-024-11041-1.


Modulation of Staphylococcus aureus gene expression during proliferation in platelet concentrates with focus on virulence and platelet functionality.

Yousuf B, Pasha R, Pineault N, Ramirez-Arcos S PLoS One. 2024; 19(7):e0307920.

PMID: 39052660 PMC: 11271859. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307920.


A fungal metabolic regulator underlies infectious synergism during Candida albicans-Staphylococcus aureus intra-abdominal co-infection.

Paul S, Todd O, Eichelberger K, Tkaczyk C, Sellman B, Noverr M Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):5746.

PMID: 38982056 PMC: 11233573. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-50058-w.


Molecular Aspects of the Functioning of Pathogenic Bacteria Biofilm Based on (QS) Signal-Response System and Innovative Non-Antibiotic Strategies for Their Elimination.

Juszczuk-Kubiak E Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(5).

PMID: 38473900 PMC: 10931677. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25052655.


References
1.
Cunin R, Glansdorff N, PIERARD A, Stalon V . Biosynthesis and metabolism of arginine in bacteria. Microbiol Rev. 1986; 50(3):314-52. PMC: 373073. DOI: 10.1128/mr.50.3.314-352.1986. View

2.
Mao Y, Valour F, Nguyen N, Doan T, Koelkebeck H, Richardson C . Multimechanistic Monoclonal Antibody Combination Targeting Key Staphylococcus aureus Virulence Determinants in a Rabbit Model of Prosthetic Joint Infection. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2021; 65(7):e0183220. PMC: 8218614. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01832-20. View

3.
Resch A, Leicht S, Saric M, Pasztor L, Jakob A, Gotz F . Comparative proteome analysis of Staphylococcus aureus biofilm and planktonic cells and correlation with transcriptome profiling. Proteomics. 2006; 6(6):1867-77. DOI: 10.1002/pmic.200500531. View

4.
Burne R, Chen Y . Bacterial ureases in infectious diseases. Microbes Infect. 2000; 2(5):533-42. DOI: 10.1016/s1286-4579(00)00312-9. View

5.
Fey P, Endres J, Yajjala V, Widhelm T, Boissy R, Bose J . A genetic resource for rapid and comprehensive phenotype screening of nonessential Staphylococcus aureus genes. mBio. 2013; 4(1):e00537-12. PMC: 3573662. DOI: 10.1128/mBio.00537-12. View