» Articles » PMID: 35964148

Interprofessional Collaboration and Patient-reported Outcomes in Inpatient Care: a Systematic Review

Overview
Journal Syst Rev
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2022 Aug 13
PMID 35964148
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Interprofessional collaboration (IPC) is seen as the "gold standard" of comprehensive care, but credible evidence concerning the effects on patient-reported outcomes (PRO) is lacking. The aim of this systematic review is to study the effect of IPC on PRO in inpatient care.

Methods: We systematically searched six electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science/Social Science Citation Index, CENTRAL (Cochrane Library), Current Contents (LIVIVO), CINAHL, and Embase) for studies published between 1997 and 2021. Additional studies were identified through citation tracking, manually searching the Internet and Google Scholar, and consultation of experts. Risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using the RoB 2 tool for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and ROBINS-I for non-randomized studies (NRS). The included controlled before-and-after study (CBA) was assessed using both the ROBINS-I and the Effective Practice and Organization of Care (EPOC) quality criteria. Results were synthesized through narrative description, grouping, and thematic analysis of extracted data.

Results: The search yielded 10,213 records, from which 22 studies (16 RCTs, five NRS, and one CBA) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. In all but five studies, RoB was assessed as being high (RoB 2) resp. critical or serious (ROBINS-I). Within these 22 studies, nine inductively derived outcomes were assessed: (i) quality of life, (ii) coping, (iii) functional ability and health status, (iv) psychiatric morbidity, (v) pain, (vi) managing one's own health care, (vii) treatment success, (viii) satisfaction, and (ix) therapeutic relationship. While some studies do not report effect estimates, and some of the reported effects appear to be imprecisely estimated, the overall results indicate that IPC may affect PRO positively across all outcomes.

Conclusions: Due to high clinical heterogeneity and high RoB, the question whether IPC affects PRO cannot be answered conclusively. Methodically rigorous studies are needed in order to answer the question of effectiveness of IPC.

Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO CRD42017073900.

Citing Articles

The impact of interprofessional collaboration between pharmacists and community health workers on medication adherence: a systematic review.

Bandiera C, Ng R, Mistry S, Harris E, Harris M, Aslani P Int J Equity Health. 2025; 24(1):58.

PMID: 40022158 PMC: 11869407. DOI: 10.1186/s12939-025-02415-4.


The effects of simulation-based education on undergraduate nursing students' competences: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.

Tong L, Li Y, Au M, Ng W, Wang S, Liu Y BMC Nurs. 2024; 23(1):400.

PMID: 38886708 PMC: 11181658. DOI: 10.1186/s12912-024-02069-7.


Evaluating the impact of interprofessional training wards on patient satisfaction and clinical outcomes: a mixed-methods analysis.

Schlosser-Hupf S, Aichner E, Meier M, Albaladejo-Fuertes S, Ruttmann K, Rusch S Front Med (Lausanne). 2024; 11:1320027.

PMID: 38444410 PMC: 10912604. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1320027.


Comparison of Effectiveness regarding a Culinary Medicine Elective for Medical Students in Germany Delivered Virtually versus In-Person.

Bottcher S, Schonebeck L, Drosch L, Plogmann A, Leineweber C, Puderbach S Nutrients. 2023; 15(19).

PMID: 37836565 PMC: 10574049. DOI: 10.3390/nu15194281.


Evaluation of the effectiveness of a joint general practitioner-pharmacist intervention on the implementation of benzodiazepine deprescribing in older adults (BESTOPH-MG trial): protocol for a cluster-randomized controlled trial.

Huon J, Nizet P, Caillet P, Lecompte H, Victorri-Vigneau C, Fournier J Front Med (Lausanne). 2023; 10:1228883.

PMID: 37711743 PMC: 10498124. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1228883.


References
1.
Kamper S, Apeldoorn A, Chiarotto A, Smeets R, Ostelo R, Guzman J . Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for chronic low back pain: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2015; 350:h444. PMC: 4353283. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.h444. View

2.
Pannick S, Davis R, Ashrafian H, Byrne B, Beveridge I, Athanasiou T . Effects of Interdisciplinary Team Care Interventions on General Medical Wards: A Systematic Review. JAMA Intern Med. 2015; 175(8):1288-98. DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.2421. View

3.
Monticone M, Ambrosini E, Laurini A, Rocca B, Foti C . In-patient multidisciplinary rehabilitation for Parkinson's disease: A randomized controlled trial. Mov Disord. 2015; 30(8):1050-8. DOI: 10.1002/mds.26256. View

4.
Goldberg S, Bradshaw L, Kearney F, Russell C, Whittamore K, Foster P . Care in specialist medical and mental health unit compared with standard care for older people with cognitive impairment admitted to general hospital: randomised controlled trial (NIHR TEAM trial). BMJ. 2013; 347:f4132. PMC: 3698942. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.f4132. View

5.
Kaiser L, Bartz S, Neugebauer E, Pietsch B, Pieper D . Interprofessional collaboration and patient-reported outcomes in inpatient care: protocol for a systematic review. Syst Rev. 2018; 7(1):126. PMC: 6102939. DOI: 10.1186/s13643-018-0797-3. View