» Articles » PMID: 3596333

Daytime Gastro-oesophageal Reflux is Important in Oesophagitis

Overview
Journal Gut
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 1987 May 1
PMID 3596333
Citations 34
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Fifty two patients were studied to investigate the patterns of gastro-oesophageal reflux during ambulatory pH monitoring and the relationship of reflux to presence and severity of oesophagitis. Twenty nine had evidence of oesophagitis which was graded according to severity. Acid exposure (pH less than 4) was calculated in each case for the total study period, the recumbent and upright periods, and the three hour period after the evening meal. Exposure in the upright period correlated closet (r=0.92: p less than 0.001) with that during the total period. Recumbent exposure correlated with both upright and postprandial exposure (p less than 0.001). Acid exposure during all four periods correlated significantly with the severity of oesophagitis, but postprandial acid exposure correlated best and recumbent acid exposure least well. Although acid clearance in the total, recumbent and upright periods correlated with oesophagitis, postprandial clearance showed the closest relationship. Thus the magnitude of daytime reflux, especially postprandial reflux and acid clearance, is more closely related than nocturnal reflux to oesophagitis. The results do not support the contention that night time reflux is inherently more injurious than daytime reflux to the oesophageal mucosa.

Citing Articles

Study of the influence of hiatus hernia on gastroesophageal reflux.

Zhu H World J Gastroenterol. 2016; 3(1):27-30.

PMID: 27006580 PMC: 4796832. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v3.i1.27.


Discussing the influence of electrode location in the result of esophageal prolonged pH monitoring.

Felix V, Yogi I, Senday D, Coimbra F, Pares D, Garcia V BMC Gastroenterol. 2014; 14:64.

PMID: 24708547 PMC: 3986454. DOI: 10.1186/1471-230X-14-64.


Ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring: technique, interpretations, and clinical indications.

Dhiman R, Saraswat V, Naik S Dig Dis Sci. 2002; 47(2):241-50.

PMID: 11855537 DOI: 10.1023/a:1013763616262.


Pathogenetic factors affecting gastroesophageal reflux in patients with esophagitis and concomitant duodenal ulcer: a multivariate analysis.

Zhu H, Huang X, Porro G, Pace F, Sangaletti O World J Gastroenterol. 2002; 4(2):153-157.

PMID: 11819262 PMC: 4688640. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v4.i2.153.


Effect of ambulatory 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring on reflux-provoking activities.

Fass R, Hell R, Sampliner R, Pulliam G, Graver E, Hartz V Dig Dis Sci. 1999; 44(11):2263-9.

PMID: 10573372 DOI: 10.1023/a:1026608804938.


References
1.
Johnson L, DeMeester T, Haggitt R . Esophageal epithelial response to gastroesophageal reflux. A quantitative study. Am J Dig Dis. 1978; 23(6):498-509. DOI: 10.1007/BF01072693. View

2.
Weinstein W, Bogoch E, Bowes K . The normal human esophageal mucosa: a histological reappraisal. Gastroenterology. 1975; 68(1):40-4. View

3.
Little A, DeMeester T, Kirchner P, OSullivan G, SKINNER D . Pathogenesis of esophagitis in patients with gastroesophageal reflux. Surgery. 1980; 88(1):101-7. View

4.
Ismail-Beigi F, Horton P, Pope 2nd C . Histological consequences of gastroesophageal reflux in man. Gastroenterology. 1970; 58(2):163-74. View

5.
Kaye M . Postprandial gastro-oesophageal reflux in healthy people. Gut. 1977; 18(9):709-12. PMC: 1411657. DOI: 10.1136/gut.18.9.709. View