» Articles » PMID: 35962869

A Guideline Proposal for Mice Preparation and Care in F-FDG PET Imaging

Overview
Journal EJNMMI Res
Date 2022 Aug 13
PMID 35962869
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The experimental outcomes of small-animal positron emission tomography (PET) imaging with F-labelled fluorodeoxyglucose (F-FDG) can be particularly compromised by animal preparation and care. Several works intend to improve research reporting and amplify the quality and reliability of published research. Though these works provide valuable information to plan and conduct animal studies, manuscripts describe different methodologies-standardization does not exist. Consequently, the variation in details reported can explain the difference in the experimental results found in the literature. Additionally, the resources and guidelines defining protocols for small-animal imaging are scarce, making it difficult for researchers to obtain and compare accurate and reproducible data. Considering the selection of suitable procedures key to ensure animal welfare and research improvement, this paper aims to prepare the way for a future guideline on mice preparation and care for PET imaging with F-FDG. For this purpose, a global standard protocol was created based on recommendations and good practices described in relevant literature.

Citing Articles

Optimisation of Animal Handing and Timing of 2-deoxy-2-[F]fluoro-D-glucose PET Tumour Imaging in Mice.

Hesketh R, Lewis D, Brindle K Mol Imaging Biol. 2024; 26(6):965-976.

PMID: 39528890 PMC: 11634969. DOI: 10.1007/s11307-024-01956-4.


Dissociable Roles of the mPFC-to-VTA Pathway in the Control of Impulsive Action and Risk-Related Decision-Making in Roman High- and Low-Avoidance Rats.

Uruena-Mendez G, Arrondeau C, Marchessaux F, Goutaudier R, Ginovart N Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2024; 27(10).

PMID: 39155560 PMC: 11450641. DOI: 10.1093/ijnp/pyae034.


Characterization of a Syngeneic Orthotopic Model of Cholangiocarcinoma by [F]FDG-PET/MRI.

Zachhuber L, Filip T, Mozayani B, Lobsch M, Scheiner S, Vician P Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(14).

PMID: 39061229 PMC: 11275149. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16142591.

References
1.
Suckow C, Kuntner C, Chow P, Silverman R, Chatziioannou A, Stout D . Multimodality rodent imaging chambers for use under barrier conditions with gas anesthesia. Mol Imaging Biol. 2008; 11(2):100-6. PMC: 2810261. DOI: 10.1007/s11307-008-0165-0. View

2.
Balaban R, Hampshire V . Challenges in small animal noninvasive imaging. ILAR J. 2001; 42(3):248-62. DOI: 10.1093/ilar.42.3.248. View

3.
Aliaga A, Rousseau J, Ouellette R, Cadorette J, van Lier J, Lecomte R . Breast cancer models to study the expression of estrogen receptors with small animal PET imaging. Nucl Med Biol. 2004; 31(6):761-70. DOI: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2004.02.011. View

4.
Omidvari N, Cabello J, Topping G, Schneider F, Paul S, Schwaiger M . PET performance evaluation of MADPET4: a small animal PET insert for a 7 T MRI scanner. Phys Med Biol. 2017; 62(22):8671-8692. DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aa910d. View

5.
Gu Z, Taschereau R, Vu N, Prout D, Silverman R, Lee J . Performance Evaluation of G8, a High-Sensitivity Benchtop Preclinical PET/CT Tomograph. J Nucl Med. 2018; 60(1):142-149. PMC: 6354226. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.118.208827. View