» Articles » PMID: 35962384

A Cross-sectional Study Examining Consideration of Self-managed Abortion Among People Seeking Facility-based Care in the United States

Overview
Journal Reprod Health
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2022 Aug 12
PMID 35962384
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: With increasing restrictions on abortion across the United States, we sought to understand whether people seeking abortion would consider ending their pregnancy on their own if unable to access a facility-based abortion.

Methods: From January to June 2019, we surveyed patients seeking abortion at 4 facilities in 3 US states. We explored consideration of self-managed abortion (SMA) using responses to the question: "Would you consider ending this pregnancy on your own if you are unable to obtain care at a health care facility?" We used multivariable Poisson regression to assess associations between individual sociodemographic, pregnancy and care-seeking characteristics and prevalence of considering SMA. In bivariate Poisson models, we also explored whether consideration of SMA differed by specific obstacles to abortion care.

Results: One-third (34%) of 741 participants indicated they would definitely or probably consider ending the pregnancy on their own if unable to obtain care at a facility. Consideration of SMA was higher among those who reported no health insurance (adjusted prevalence ratio [aPR] = 1.66; 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 1.12-2.44), described the pregnancy as unintended (aPR = 1.53; 95% CI 1.08-2.16), were seeking abortion due to concerns about their own physical or mental health (aPR = 1.50, 95% CI 1.02, 2.20), or experienced obstacles that delayed their abortion care seeking (aPR = 2.26, 95% CI 1.49, 3.40). Compared to those who would not consider SMA, participants who would consider SMA expressed higher difficulty finding an abortion facility (35 vs. 27%, p = 0.019), figuring out how to get to the clinic (29 vs 21%, p = 0.021) and needing multiple clinic visits (23 vs 17%, p = 0.044).

Conclusions: One in three people seeking facility-based abortion would consider SMA if unable to obtain abortion care at a facility. As abortion access becomes increasingly restricted in the US, SMA may become more common. Future research should continue to monitor people's consideration and use of SMA and ensure that they have access to safe and effective methods.

Citing Articles

The impact of parental involvement laws on minors seeking abortion services: a systematic review.

Kramer A, Ti A, Travis L, Laboe A, Ochieng W, Young M Health Aff Sch. 2024; 1(4):qxad045.

PMID: 38756747 PMC: 10986272. DOI: 10.1093/haschl/qxad045.


Judicial bypass for minors post-.

Horvath S, Frietsche S Womens Health (Lond). 2023; 19:17455057231219601.

PMID: 38146197 PMC: 10752100. DOI: 10.1177/17455057231219601.


Self-Managed Abortion in the United States.

Verma N, Grossman D Curr Obstet Gynecol Rep. 2023; 12(2):70-75.

PMID: 37305376 PMC: 9989574. DOI: 10.1007/s13669-023-00354-x.

References
1.
Moseson H, Filippa S, Baum S, Gerdts C, Grossman D . Reducing underreporting of stigmatized pregnancy outcomes: results from a mixed-methods study of self-managed abortion in Texas using the list-experiment method. BMC Womens Health. 2019; 19(1):113. PMC: 6720920. DOI: 10.1186/s12905-019-0812-4. View

2.
Fuentes L, Baum S, Keefe-Oates B, White K, Hopkins K, Potter J . Texas women's decisions and experiences regarding self-managed abortion. BMC Womens Health. 2020; 20(1):6. PMC: 6945569. DOI: 10.1186/s12905-019-0877-0. View

3.
Biggs M, Neilands T, Kaller S, Wingo E, Ralph L . Developing and validating the Psychosocial Burden among people Seeking Abortion Scale (PB-SAS). PLoS One. 2020; 15(12):e0242463. PMC: 7728247. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242463. View

4.
Upadhyay U, Cartwright A, Grossman D . Barriers to abortion care and incidence of attempted self-managed abortion among individuals searching Google for abortion care: A national prospective study. Contraception. 2021; 106:49-56. DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2021.09.009. View

5.
Zocchetti C, Consonni D, Bertazzi P . Relationship between prevalence rate ratios and odds ratios in cross-sectional studies. Int J Epidemiol. 1997; 26(1):220-3. DOI: 10.1093/ije/26.1.220. View