» Articles » PMID: 35959233

Paramedic Ability in Interpreting Electrocardiogram with ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) in Saudi Arabia

Overview
Publisher Dove Medical Press
Specialty Health Services
Date 2022 Aug 12
PMID 35959233
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To evaluate paramedic ability in recognizing 12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) with ST-segment Elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in Saudi Arabia.

Methods: This is a quantitative exploratory cross-sectional study using an electronic survey of paramedics was conducted between June and September 2021. The survey included demographics, educational and clinical experiences, and multiple 12-lead ECG strip questions to assess participants' ability to recognize STEMI. We reported the overall sensitivity, specificity, and correct proportions with 95% Confidence Intervals (CI).

Results: Eighty-four paramedics completed the survey, and 65% of them were between 24 and 29 years old, with a median, of three years of field experience. Overall sensitivity and specificity were 58.39% (95% CI, 50.4% to 66.1%) and 29.01% (95% CI, 25.15% to 33.1%), respectively. In total, 67.1% correctly identified inferior STEMI, whereas only 50% correctly identified lateral STEMI. Both STEMIs were correctly identified by 41%, and the majority misinterpreted STEMI mimics (ECG rhythms with similar ECG morphology to STEMI). The proportion who correctly recognized left bundle branch block was 14.8%, pericarditis was 10.9%, and ventricular pacing was 1.4%. However, almost third of participants correctly identified right bundle branch block (32.9%) and left ventricle hypertrophy (30.7%). Overall, there was no correlation between the correct ECG interpretation of STEMIs and educational and clinical experiences.

Conclusion: Paramedics were able to identify STEMI events in prehospital settings with moderate sensitivity and low specificity with limited ability to differentiate between STEMI and STEMI mimics. Therefore, additional training in ECG interpretation could improve their clinical decision-making, and to ensure that proper care and treatment is provided. Further research on a large, representative sample of paramedics across the country could provide more definitive evidence to establish a greater degree of accuracy in detecting STEMI in prehospital settings.

Citing Articles

Electrocardiographic interpretation by emergency medical services professionals in Saudi Arabia: A cross sectional study.

Alalwan M, Alshammari T, Alawjan H, Alkhayat H, Alsaleh A, Alamri I PLoS One. 2023; 18(10):e0292868.

PMID: 37856426 PMC: 10586609. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292868.

References
1.
Huitema A, Zhu T, Alemayehu M, Lavi S . Diagnostic accuracy of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction by various healthcare providers. Int J Cardiol. 2014; 177(3):825-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.11.032. View

2.
Ting H, Krumholz H, Bradley E, Cone D, Curtis J, Drew B . Implementation and integration of prehospital ECGs into systems of care for acute coronary syndrome: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Interdisciplinary Council on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research, Emergency.... Circulation. 2008; 118(10):1066-79. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.190402. View

3.
Bassand J, Hamm C, Ardissino D, Boersma E, Budaj A, Fernandez-Aviles F . Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2007; 28(13):1598-660. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm161. View

4.
Lee C, Van Gelder C, Cone D . Early cardiac catheterization laboratory activation by paramedics for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction on prehospital 12-lead electrocardiograms. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2010; 14(2):153-8. DOI: 10.3109/10903120903537213. View

5.
Sejersten M, Young D, Clemmensen P, Lipton J, Versteeg D, Wall T . Comparison of the ability of paramedics with that of cardiologists in diagnosing ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction in patients with acute chest pain. Am J Cardiol. 2002; 90(9):995-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(02)02685-1. View