» Articles » PMID: 35958902

Hypogonadism and Urologic Surgeries: a Narrative Review

Overview
Date 2022 Aug 12
PMID 35958902
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Objective: Previous studies indicated that the treatment of male hypogonadism can be beneficial for intraoperative and postsurgical outcomes. In this study, we aimed to determine the impact of male hypogonadism on urologic surgeries. We provided an overview of the key studies in the field with the focus on the outcomes of urologic surgeries in hypogonadal men with/without testosterone replacement therapy (TRT).

Methods: We performed a literature review in PubMed and Google Scholar databases for the most relevant articles pertaining to the outlined topics without placing any limitations on publication years or study designs. We included full-text English articles published in peer reviewed journals between January 1970 and March 2022.

Key Content And Findings: Androgen deficiency is a common finding after major urologic surgeries. Although guidelines recommend against TRT in men with prostate carcinoma, recent investigations showed no association between TRT and disease progression and recurrence. Indeed, recent evidence suggested that low androgen levels could be related to high grade prostate carcinoma and increased risk of upgrading from low to high grade disease. Investigations on the application of TRT in benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) patients also revealed contrasting results. While some studies suggested higher rates of prostate-related events in men who received TRT, others showed that TRT could alleviate urinary symptoms in hypogonadal men with BPH. Decreased testosterone level is commonly seen in bladder cancer patients. The treatment of perioperative androgen deficiency can reduce postoperative morbidities and lower the risk of recurrence in these patients. Low testosterone levels are observed in approximately half of the men who undergo artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) placement and can increase the risk of complications.

Conclusions: The role of testosterone treatment in patients with urologic diseases such as prostate carcinoma and BPH is controversial. Further investigations are needed to determine the impact of hypogonadism and TRT on the outcomes of urologic surgeries in patients with androgen deficiency.

Citing Articles

Artificial urinary sphincter and stricture disease: surgical principles in management.

Martins F, Bernal J, Tryfonyuk L, Holm H Transl Androl Urol. 2024; 13(8):1717-1728.

PMID: 39280683 PMC: 11399027. DOI: 10.21037/tau-23-16.


Untreated hypogonadism and testosterone replacement therapy in hypogonadal men are associated with a decreased risk of subsequent prostate cancer: a population-based study.

Asanad K, Horns J, Driggs N, Samplaski M, Hotaling J Int J Impot Res. 2024; 36(6):655-658.

PMID: 38177194 DOI: 10.1038/s41443-023-00820-3.

References
1.
Carrero J, Qureshi A, Nakashima A, Arver S, Parini P, Lindholm B . Prevalence and clinical implications of testosterone deficiency in men with end-stage renal disease. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2010; 26(1):184-90. DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfq397. View

2.
Xylinas E, Ploussard G, Durand X, Fabre A, Salomon L, Allory Y . Low pretreatment total testosterone (< 3 ng/mL) predicts extraprostatic disease in prostatectomy specimens from patients with preoperative localized prostate cancer. BJU Int. 2010; 107(9):1400-3. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09816.x. View

3.
Bailey G, Linder B, Rivera M, Ziegelmann M, Rangel L, Elliott D . The impact of androgen deprivation on artificial urinary sphincter outcomes. Transl Androl Urol. 2016; 5(5):756-761. PMC: 5071185. DOI: 10.21037/tau.2016.06.07. View

4.
Kawakami J, Cowan J, Elkin E, Latini D, DuChane J, Carroll P . Androgen-deprivation therapy as primary treatment for localized prostate cancer: data from Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urologic Research Endeavor (CaPSURE). Cancer. 2006; 106(8):1708-14. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.21799. View

5.
Trost L, Mulhall J . Challenges in Testosterone Measurement, Data Interpretation, and Methodological Appraisal of Interventional Trials. J Sex Med. 2016; 13(7):1029-46. PMC: 5516925. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2016.04.068. View