» Articles » PMID: 35958194

Integrative Analysis of Transcriptome and MiRNAome Reveals Molecular Mechanisms Regulating Pericarp Thickness in Sweet Corn During Kernel Development

Overview
Journal Front Plant Sci
Date 2022 Aug 12
PMID 35958194
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Pericarp thickness affects the edible quality of sweet corn ( L. Sturt.). Therefore, breeding varieties with a thin pericarp is important for the quality breeding of sweet corn. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying the pericarp development remain largely unclear. We performed an integrative analysis of mRNA and miRNA sequencing to elucidate the genetic mechanism regulating pericarp thickness during kernel development (at 15 days, 19 days, and 23 days after pollination) of two sweet corn inbred lines with different pericarp thicknesses (M03, with a thinner pericarp and M08, with a thicker pericarp). A total of 2,443 and 1,409 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified in M03 and M08, respectively. Our results indicate that phytohormone-mediated programmed cell death (PCD) may play a critical role in determining pericarp thickness in sweet corn. Auxin (AUX), gibberellin (GA), and brassinosteroid (BR) signal transduction may indirectly mediate PCD to regulate pericarp thickness in M03 (the thin pericarp variety). In contrast, abscisic acid (ABA), cytokinin (CK), and ethylene (ETH) signaling may be the key regulators of pericarp PCD in M08 (the thick pericarp variety). Furthermore, 110 differentially expressed microRNAs (DEMIs) and 478 differentially expressed target genes were identified. miRNA164-, miRNA167-, and miRNA156-mediated miRNA-mRNA pairs may participate in regulating pericarp thickness. The expression results of DEGs were validated by quantitative real-time PCR. These findings provide insights into the molecular mechanisms regulating pericarp thickness and propose the objective of breeding sweet corn varieties with a thin pericarp.

Citing Articles

Comparative Transcriptome Analysis Reveals Key Functions of MiMYB Gene Family in Macadamia Nut Pericarp Formation.

Tan Q, Huan X, Pan Z, Yang X, Wei Y, Zhou C Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(13).

PMID: 38999950 PMC: 11241416. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25136840.


Genetic analysis and QTL mapping for pericarp thickness in maize (Zea mays L.).

Gong G, Jia H, Tang Y, Pei H, Zhai L, Huang J BMC Plant Biol. 2024; 24(1):338.

PMID: 38664642 PMC: 11044598. DOI: 10.1186/s12870-024-05052-1.


A transcriptomic evaluation of the mechanism of programmed cell death of the replaceable bud in Chinese chestnut.

Guo Y, Zhang S, Li Y, Zhang X, Liu H, Liu S Open Life Sci. 2023; 18(1):20220635.

PMID: 37426617 PMC: 10329280. DOI: 10.1515/biol-2022-0635.

References
1.
Ma N, Feng H, Meng X, Li D, Yang D, Wu C . Overexpression of tomato SlNAC1 transcription factor alters fruit pigmentation and softening. BMC Plant Biol. 2014; 14:351. PMC: 4272553. DOI: 10.1186/s12870-014-0351-y. View

2.
Iten M, Hoffmann T, Grill E . Receptors and signalling components of plant hormones. J Recept Signal Transduct Res. 1999; 19(1-4):41-58. DOI: 10.3109/10799899909036636. View

3.
Koch K . Sucrose metabolism: regulatory mechanisms and pivotal roles in sugar sensing and plant development. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2004; 7(3):235-46. DOI: 10.1016/j.pbi.2004.03.014. View

4.
Xu J, Zhang S . Mitogen-activated protein kinase cascades in signaling plant growth and development. Trends Plant Sci. 2014; 20(1):56-64. DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2014.10.001. View

5.
Nishihama R, Ishikawa M, Araki S, Soyano T, Asada T, Machida Y . The NPK1 mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase is a regulator of cell-plate formation in plant cytokinesis. Genes Dev. 2001; 15(3):352-63. PMC: 312623. DOI: 10.1101/gad.863701. View