» Articles » PMID: 35958158

Cross-kingdom Co-occurrence Networks in the Plant Microbiome: Importance and Ecological Interpretations

Overview
Journal Front Microbiol
Specialty Microbiology
Date 2022 Aug 12
PMID 35958158
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Microbial co-occurrence network analysis is being widely used for data exploration in plant microbiome research. Still, challenges lie in how well these microbial networks represent natural microbial communities and how well we can interpret and extract eco-evolutionary insights from the networks. Although many technical solutions have been proposed, in this perspective, we touch on the grave problem of kingdom-level bias in network representation and interpretation. We underscore the eco-evolutionary significance of using cross-kingdom (bacterial-fungal) co-occurrence networks to increase the network's representability of natural communities. To do so, we demonstrate how ecosystem-level interpretation of plant microbiome evolution changes with and without multi-kingdom analysis. Then, to overcome oversimplified interpretation of the networks stemming from the stereotypical dichotomy between bacteria and fungi, we recommend three avenues for ecological interpretation: (1) understanding dynamics and mechanisms of co-occurrence networks through generalized Lotka-Volterra and consumer-resource models, (2) finding alternative ecological explanations for individual negative and positive fungal-bacterial edges, and (3) connecting cross-kingdom networks to abiotic and biotic (host) environments.

Citing Articles

Enhancing microbial predator-prey detection with network and trait-based analyses.

Martinez Rendon C, Braun C, Kappelsberger M, Boy J, Casanova-Katny A, Glaser K Microbiome. 2025; 13(1):37.

PMID: 39905550 PMC: 11792678. DOI: 10.1186/s40168-025-02035-8.


Networks as tools for defining emergent properties of microbiomes and their stability.

Kajihara K, Hynson N Microbiome. 2024; 12(1):184.

PMID: 39342398 PMC: 11439251. DOI: 10.1186/s40168-024-01868-z.


Grazing intensity alters network complexity and predator-prey relationships in the soil microbiome.

Camuy-Velez L, Banerjee S, Sedivec K Appl Environ Microbiol. 2024; 90(10):e0042524.

PMID: 39235241 PMC: 11497777. DOI: 10.1128/aem.00425-24.


A Review on the Interaction of Acetic Acid Bacteria and Microbes in Food Fermentation: A Microbial Ecology Perspective.

Han D, Yang Y, Guo Z, Dai S, Jiang M, Zhu Y Foods. 2024; 13(16).

PMID: 39200461 PMC: 11353490. DOI: 10.3390/foods13162534.


The impact of filamentous plant pathogens on the host microbiota.

Flores-Nunez V, Stukenbrock E BMC Biol. 2024; 22(1):175.

PMID: 39148076 PMC: 11328434. DOI: 10.1186/s12915-024-01965-3.


References
1.
Fisher C, Mehta P . Identifying keystone species in the human gut microbiome from metagenomic timeseries using sparse linear regression. PLoS One. 2014; 9(7):e102451. PMC: 4108331. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0102451. View

2.
Jung B, Park J, Kim N, Li T, Kim S, Bartley L . Cooperative interactions between seed-borne bacterial and air-borne fungal pathogens on rice. Nat Commun. 2018; 9(1):31. PMC: 5750236. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-017-02430-2. View

3.
Chen M, He S, Li J, Hu W, Ma Y, Wu L . Co-occurrence patterns between bacterial and fungal communities in response to a vegetation gradient in a freshwater wetland. Can J Microbiol. 2019; 65(10):722-737. DOI: 10.1139/cjm-2019-0147. View

4.
Bosmans L, de Bruijn I, De Mot R, Rediers H, Lievens B . Agar composition affects in vitro screening of biocontrol activity of antagonistic microorganisms. J Microbiol Methods. 2016; 127:7-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2016.05.004. View

5.
Duran P, Thiergart T, Garrido-Oter R, Agler M, Kemen E, Schulze-Lefert P . Microbial Interkingdom Interactions in Roots Promote Arabidopsis Survival. Cell. 2018; 175(4):973-983.e14. PMC: 6218654. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.10.020. View