» Articles » PMID: 35958086

Psychological Inoculation Can Reduce Susceptibility to Misinformation in Large Rational Agent Networks

Overview
Journal R Soc Open Sci
Specialty Science
Date 2022 Aug 12
PMID 35958086
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The unchecked spread of misinformation is recognized as an increasing threat to public, scientific and democratic health. Online networks are a contributing cause of this spread, with echo chambers and polarization indicative of the interplay between the search behaviours of users and reinforcement processes within the system they inhabit. Recent empirical work has focused on interventions aimed at inoculating people against misinformation, yielding success on the individual level. However, given the evolving, dynamic information context of online networks, important questions remain regarding how such inoculation interventions interact with network systems. Here we use an agent-based model of a social network populated with belief-updating users. We find that although equally rational agents may be assisted by inoculation interventions to reject misinformation, even among such agents, intervention efficacy is temporally sensitive. We find that as beliefs disseminate, users form self-reinforcing echo chambers, leading to belief consolidation-irrespective of their veracity. Interrupting this process requires 'front-loading' of inoculation interventions by targeting critical thresholds of network users before consolidation occurs. We further demonstrate the value of harnessing tipping point dynamics for herd immunity effects, and note that inoculation processes do not necessarily lead to increased rates of 'false-positive' rejections of truthful communications.

Citing Articles

Inoculation hesitancy: an exploration of challenges in scaling inoculation theory.

Johnson A, Madsen J R Soc Open Sci. 2024; 11(6):231711.

PMID: 39100154 PMC: 11296080. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.231711.


Belief-consistent information is most shared despite being the least surprising.

Goebel J, Susmann M, Parthasarathy S, El Gamal H, Garrett R, Wegener D Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):6109.

PMID: 38480773 PMC: 10937659. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-56086-2.


Changing the incentive structure of social media platforms to halt the spread of misinformation.

Globig L, Holtz N, Sharot T Elife. 2023; 12.

PMID: 37278047 PMC: 10259455. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.85767.


Psychological inoculation protects against the social media infodemic.

McPhedran R, Ratajczak M, Mawby M, King E, Yang Y, Gold N Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):5780.

PMID: 37031339 PMC: 10082776. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-32962-1.

References
1.
Van Bavel J, Baicker K, Boggio P, Capraro V, Cichocka A, Cikara M . Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response. Nat Hum Behav. 2020; 4(5):460-471. DOI: 10.1038/s41562-020-0884-z. View

2.
Loomba S, de Figueiredo A, Piatek S, de Graaf K, Larson H . Measuring the impact of COVID-19 vaccine misinformation on vaccination intent in the UK and USA. Nat Hum Behav. 2021; 5(3):337-348. DOI: 10.1038/s41562-021-01056-1. View

3.
Brainard J, Hunter P . Misinformation making a disease outbreak worse: outcomes compared for influenza, monkeypox, and norovirus. Simulation. 2021; 96(4):365-374. PMC: 8282656. DOI: 10.1177/0037549719885021. View

4.
Madsen J, Pilditch T . A method for evaluating cognitively informed micro-targeted campaign strategies: An agent-based model proof of principle. PLoS One. 2018; 13(4):e0193909. PMC: 5892896. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193909. View

5.
Maertens R, Roozenbeek J, Basol M, van der Linden S . Long-term effectiveness of inoculation against misinformation: Three longitudinal experiments. J Exp Psychol Appl. 2020; 27(1):1-16. DOI: 10.1037/xap0000315. View