» Articles » PMID: 35955282

Effect of Non-Thermal Plasma Treatment of Contaminated Zirconia Surface on Adhesion and Osteoblast Viability

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2022 Aug 12
PMID 35955282
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Plasma treatment on a zirconia surface prevents bacterial contamination and maintains osteoblast activity. To assess the degree of adhesion of Porphyromonas gingivalis on a zirconia surface after non-thermal plasma (NTP) treatment, specimens were treated with plasma for 60, 300, and 600 s, after which P. gingivalis was inoculated onto the surface and incubated for 48 h. To assess osteoblast activity after NTP treatment, osteoblasts (MC3T3-E1) were dispensed onto the specimens contaminated with P. gingivalis immediately after NTP for 60 and 120 s, followed by incubation for 48, 72, and 96 h. P. gingivalis was cultured after 60 s of NTP treatment of zirconia. The NTP and control groups showed no significant difference (p = 0.91), but adhesion was significantly increased following NTP treatment for 300 s or longer (300, 600 s groups) (p < 0.05). After NTP treatment of P. gingivalis-contaminated zirconia, osteoblast activity significantly increased at 72 and 96 h (I60 and I120 s group) in the groups treated with plasma (p < 0.017). Application of NTP to dental zirconia implants for 60 s not only inhibits the proliferation of P. gingivalis, which causes peri-implantitis but also increases osseointegration on zirconia surfaces contaminated with P. gingivalis.

Citing Articles

Nonthermal Atmospheric Pressure Plasma Treatment of Endosteal Implants for Osseointegration and Antimicrobial Efficacy: A Comprehensive Review.

Schafer S, Swain T, Parra M, Slavin B, Mirsky N, Nayak V Bioengineering (Basel). 2024; 11(4).

PMID: 38671741 PMC: 11048570. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering11040320.

References
1.
Park Y, Chung S, Shon W . Peri-implant bone formation and surface characteristics of rough surface zirconia implants manufactured by powder injection molding technique in rabbit tibiae. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012; 24(5):586-91. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02468.x. View

2.
Hanawa T . Zirconia versus titanium in dentistry: A review. Dent Mater J. 2019; 39(1):24-36. DOI: 10.4012/dmj.2019-172. View

3.
Heinlin J, Morfill G, Landthaler M, Stolz W, Isbary G, Zimmermann J . Plasma medicine: possible applications in dermatology. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2010; 8(12):968-76. DOI: 10.1111/j.1610-0387.2010.07495.x. View

4.
Yoshinari M . Future prospects of zirconia for oral implants -A review. Dent Mater J. 2019; 39(1):37-45. DOI: 10.4012/dmj.2019-151. View

5.
Kim K, Eo M, Thi Hoang Nguyen T, Kim S . General review of titanium toxicity. Int J Implant Dent. 2019; 5(1):10. PMC: 6409289. DOI: 10.1186/s40729-019-0162-x. View