» Articles » PMID: 35955174

Evaluation of the Biocompatibility and Osteogenic Properties of Metal Oxide Coatings Applied by Magnetron Sputtering As Potential Biofunctional Surface Modifications for Orthopedic Implants

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2022 Aug 12
PMID 35955174
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Biomaterials with adequate properties to direct a biological response are essential for orthopedic and dental implants. The surface properties are responsible for the biological response; thus, coatings with biologically relevant properties such as osteoinduction are exciting options to tailor the surface of different bulk materials. Metal oxide coatings such as TiO, ZrO, NbO and TaO have been suggested as promising for orthopedic and dental implants. However, a comparative study among them is still missing to select the most promising for bone-growth-related applications. In this work, using magnetron sputtering, TiO, ZrO, TaO, and NbO thin films were deposited on Si (100) substrates. The coatings were characterized by Optical Profilometry, Scanning Electron Microscopy, Energy-Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy, X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy, X-ray Diffraction, Water Contact Angle measurements, and Surface Free Energy calculations. The cell adhesion, viability, proliferation, and differentiation toward the osteoblastic phenotype of mesenchymal stem cells plated on the coatings were measured to define the biological response. Results confirmed that all coatings were biocompatible. However, a more significant number of cells and proliferative cells were observed on NbO and TaO compared to TiO and ZrO Nevertheless, NbO and TaO seemed to induce cell differentiation toward the osteoblastic phenotype in a longer cell culture time than TiO and ZrO.

Citing Articles

Amorphous TiOnano-coating on stainless steel to improve its biological response.

Garcia-Perez V, Hotchkiss K, Silva-Bermudez P, Hernandez M, Prado-Prone G, Olivares-Navarrete R Biomed Mater. 2024; 19(5).

PMID: 39121890 PMC: 11337115. DOI: 10.1088/1748-605X/ad6dc4.


Biomaterials as Implants in the Orthopedic Field for Regenerative Medicine: Metal versus Synthetic Polymers.

Al-Shalawi F, Mohamed Ariff A, Jung D, Mohd Ariffin M, Seng Kim C, Brabazon D Polymers (Basel). 2023; 15(12).

PMID: 37376247 PMC: 10303232. DOI: 10.3390/polym15122601.


Development of Wide-Angle Depolarizing Reflector at 1064 nm.

Zhu H, Jiang H, Guo K, Peng Y, Xin Y, Zhang G Materials (Basel). 2023; 16(12).

PMID: 37374440 PMC: 10303084. DOI: 10.3390/ma16124258.


UV Sterilization Effects and Osteoblast Proliferation on Amorphous Carbon Films Classified Based on Optical Constants.

Kanasugi K, Arimura K, Alanazi A, Ohgoe Y, Manome Y, Hiratsuka M Bioengineering (Basel). 2022; 9(10).

PMID: 36290473 PMC: 9598301. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering9100505.

References
1.
Almeida Alves C, Fialho L, Marques S, Pires S, Rico P, Palacio C . MC3T3-E1 cell response to microporous tantalum oxide surfaces enriched with Ca, P and Mg. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2021; 124:112008. DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2021.112008. View

2.
Ansari S, Ito K, Hofmann S . Alkaline Phosphatase Activity of Serum Affects Osteogenic Differentiation Cultures. ACS Omega. 2022; 7(15):12724-12733. PMC: 9026015. DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.1c07225. View

3.
Luo J, Walker M, Xiao Y, Donnelly H, Dalby M, Salmeron-Sanchez M . The influence of nanotopography on cell behaviour through interactions with the extracellular matrix - A review. Bioact Mater. 2022; 15:145-159. PMC: 8940943. DOI: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.11.024. View

4.
Rizzo P . A review on the latest advancements in the non-invasive evaluation/monitoring of dental and trans-femoral implants. Biomed Eng Lett. 2020; 10(1):83-102. PMC: 7046827. DOI: 10.1007/s13534-019-00126-8. View

5.
Komori T . Functions of Osteocalcin in Bone, Pancreas, Testis, and Muscle. Int J Mol Sci. 2020; 21(20). PMC: 7589887. DOI: 10.3390/ijms21207513. View