» Articles » PMID: 35954914

What Does It Take to Get Somebody Back to Work After Severe Acquired Brain Injury? Service Actions Within the Vocational Intervention Program (VIP 2.0)

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2022 Aug 12
PMID 35954914
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Little is known about service actions delivered in the complex intervention of vocational rehabilitation (VR) for people with severe acquired brain injury (ABI). Scale-up of the Vocational Intervention Program (VIP) across the 12 Community teams of the NSW Brain Injury Rehabilitation Program provided an opportunity to analyse the intensity and profile of actions delivered in providing VR programs. Seventy-two participants with severe TBI were supported in returning to either pre-injury employment (FastTrack, FT, = 27) or new employment (NewTrack, NT, = 50), delivered by two types of VR providers (Disability Employment Service DES; private providers). VR providers documented their service actions in hours and minutes, using the Case Management Taxonomy, adapted to VR. The NT pathway required significantly higher levels of intervention in comparison to FT (25 h, five minutes vs. 35 h, 30 min, = 0.048, W = 446). Case coordination was the most frequent service action overall (41.7% of total time for FT, 42.3% for NT). DES providers recorded significantly greater amounts of time undertaking engagement, assessment and planning, and emotional/motivational support actions compared to private providers. Overall duration of the programs were a median of 46 weeks (NT) and 36 weeks (FT), respectively. This study helps illuminate the profile of VR interventions for people with severe TBI.

Citing Articles

A Realist Evaluation of Case Management Models for People with Complex Health Conditions Using Novel Methods and Tools-What Works, for Whom, and under What Circumstances?.

Lukersmith S, Salvador-Carulla L, Chung Y, Du W, Sarkissian A, Millington M Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20(5).

PMID: 36901374 PMC: 10002263. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20054362.

References
1.
Wehman P, Kregel J, Keyser-Marcus L, Sherron-Targett P, Campbell L, West M . Supported employment for persons with traumatic brain injury: a preliminary investigation of long-term follow-up costs and program efficiency. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003; 84(2):192-6. DOI: 10.1053/apmr.2003.50027. View

2.
Forslund M, Roe C, Arango-Lasprilla J, Sigurdardottir S, Andelic N . Impact of personal and environmental factors on employment outcome two years after moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury. J Rehabil Med. 2013; 45(8):801-7. DOI: 10.2340/16501977-1168. View

3.
OBrien L . Achieving a successful and sustainable return to the workforce after ABI: a client-centred approach. Brain Inj. 2007; 21(5):465-78. DOI: 10.1080/02699050701315134. View

4.
Ponsford J, Downing M, Olver J, Ponsford M, Acher R, Carty M . Longitudinal follow-up of patients with traumatic brain injury: outcome at two, five, and ten years post-injury. J Neurotrauma. 2013; 31(1):64-77. DOI: 10.1089/neu.2013.2997. View

5.
Devine A, Shields M, Dimov S, Dickinson H, Vaughan C, Bentley R . Australia's Disability Employment Services Program: Participant Perspectives on Factors Influencing Access to Work. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(21). PMC: 8582653. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph182111485. View