» Articles » PMID: 35950281

Effect of Acquisition Techniques, Latest Kernels, and Advanced Monoenergetic Post-processing for Stent Visualization with Third-generation Dual-source CT

Overview
Date 2022 Aug 11
PMID 35950281
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

PURPOSE The purpose of this study is to systematically evaluate the effect of tube voltage, current kernels, and monoenergetic post-processing on stent visualization. METHODS A 6 mm chrome-cobalt peripheral stent was placed in a dedicated phantom and scanned with the available tube voltage settings of a third-generation dual-source scanner in single-energy (SE) and dual-energy (DE) mode. Images were reconstructed using the latest convolution kernels and monoenergetic reconstructions (40-190 keV) for DE. The sharpness of stent struts (S), struts width (SW), contrast-to-noise-ratios (CNR), and pseudoenhancement (PE) between the vessel with and without stent were analyzed using an in-house built automatic analysis tool. Measurements were standardized through calculated z-scores. Z-scores were combined for stent (SQ), luminal (LQ), and overall depiction quality (OQ) by adding S and SW, CNR and SW and PE, and S and SW and CNR and PE. Two readers rated overall stent depiction on a 5-point Likert-scale. Agreement was calculated using linear-weighted kappa. Correlations were calculated using Spearman correlation coefficient. RESULTS Maximum values of S and CNR were 169.1 HU/pixel for [DE; 100/ Sn 150 kV; Qr59; 40 keV] and 50.0 for [SE; 70 kV; Bv36]. Minimum values of SW and PE were 2.615 mm for [DE; 80 to 90/ Sn 150 kV; Qr59; 140 to 190 keV] and 0.12 HU for [DE; 80/ Sn 150 kV; Qr36; 190 keV]. Best combined z-scores of SQ, LQ, and OQ were 4.53 for [DE; 100/ Sn 150 kV; Qr 59; 40 keV], 1.23 for [DE; 100/ Sn 150 kV; Qr59; 140 keV] and 2.95 for [DE; 90/ Sn 150 kV; Qr59; 50 keV]. Best OQ of SE was ranked third with 2.89 for [SE; 90 kV; Bv59]. Subjective agreement was excellent (kappa=0.86; P < .001) and correlated well with OQ (rs=0.94, P < .001). CONCLUSION Combining DE computed tomography (CT) acquisition with the latest kernels and monoenergetic post-processing allows for improved stent visualization as compared with SECT. The best overall results were obtained for monoenergetic reconstructions with 50 keV from DECT 90/Sn 150 kV acquisitions using kernel Qr59.

Citing Articles

Determining the Optimal Energy Level of Virtual Monoenergetic Images in Dual-Source CT for Diagnosis of Bowel Obstruction and Colitis.

Lahuna L, Greffier J, Goupil J, Frandon J, Pastor M, de Oliveira F Diagnostics (Basel). 2023; 13(23).

PMID: 38066732 PMC: 10705951. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13233491.


Diagnostic value of DECT-based colored collagen maps for the assessment of cruciate ligaments in patients with acute trauma.

Gruenewald L, Koch V, Martin S, Yel I, Mahmoudi S, Bernatz S Eur Radiol. 2023; 33(9):6339-6350.

PMID: 37000215 PMC: 10415420. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-023-09558-4.


Diagnostic Value of DECT-Based Collagen Mapping for Assessing the Distal Tibiofibular Syndesmosis in Patients with Acute Trauma.

Gruenewald L, Leitner D, Koch V, Martin S, Yel I, Mahmoudi S Diagnostics (Basel). 2023; 13(3).

PMID: 36766638 PMC: 9914815. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13030533.

References
1.
Sudarski S, Apfaltrer P, Nance Jr J, Meyer M, Fink C, Hohenberger P . Objective and subjective image quality of liver parenchyma and hepatic metastases with virtual monoenergetic dual-source dual-energy CT reconstructions: an analysis in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Acad Radiol. 2014; 21(4):514-22. DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2014.01.001. View

2.
Zhu X, McCullough W, Mecca P, Servaes S, Darge K . Dual-energy compared to single-energy CT in pediatric imaging: a phantom study for DECT clinical guidance. Pediatr Radiol. 2016; 46(12):1671-1679. DOI: 10.1007/s00247-016-3668-x. View

3.
Bongers M, Bier G, Kloth C, Schabel C, Fritz J, Nikolaou K . Improved Delineation of Pulmonary Embolism and Venous Thrombosis Through Frequency Selective Nonlinear Blending in Computed Tomography. Invest Radiol. 2016; 52(4):240-244. DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000333. View

4.
Kaempf M, Ketelsen D, Syha R, Sixt S, Mangold S, Thomas C . CT angiography of various superficial femoral artery stents: an in vitro phantom study. Eur J Radiol. 2011; 81(7):1584-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.04.014. View

5.
Boos J, Kropil P, Lanzman R, Aissa J, Schleich C, Antoch G . Stent Lumen Visibility in Single-energy CT Angiography: Does Tube Potential Matter?. Acad Radiol. 2016; 23(6):752-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2016.03.012. View