» Articles » PMID: 35950277

Diffusion Tensor Imaging and Diffusion-weighted Imaging on Axillary Lymph Node Status in Breast Cancer Patients

Overview
Date 2022 Aug 11
PMID 35950277
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

PURPOSE This article will examine the usefulness of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) on the assessment of axillary lymph nodes (ALN) of breast cancer patients. METHODS Axillary lymph nodes in 66 breast cancer patients were examined by DTI and DWI, and the largest lymph node with increased cortical thickness in axilla was selected. Morphological features, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), volume anisotropy, and fractional anisotropy values were measured by using a special software. Imaging findings and histopathological results were recorded. RESULTS Metastatic ALN were detected in 43 (65.1%) patients. Cortical thickness of the metastatic ALN was significantly higher than the non-metastatic ALNs (P < .001), and the long-axis-to-shortaxis ratio was significantly lower in metastatic ALNs (P < .001). There was a statistically significant difference between the ALN status and fatty hilum presence (P < .001). Apparent diffusion coefficient values of metastatic ALNs were statistically lower than those of non-metastatic ALNs (P < .001) using a cutoff value of 1.26 × 10-3 mm2 /s for b=500 ADC and 1.21 × 10-3 mm2 /s for b=800 ADC which had 97.7% sensitivity and 91.3% specificity. Fractional anisotropy and volume anisotropy values were significantly different between both groups. A cutoff value of 0.47 for b-500 fractional anisotropy had 83.7% sensitivity, 69.6% specificity 69.6% positive predictive value, and 83.7% negative predictive value. A cutoff value of 0.33 for b=500 volume anisotropy had 76.7% sensitivity, 78.3% specificity, 86.8% positive predictive value, and 64.3% negative predictive value. CONCLUSION Apparent diffusion coefficient value of metastatic ALNs was found to be significantly lower than those of non-metastatic ALN, and DTI metrics of metastatic ALN were found to be significantly higher than those of non-metastatic ALN. Overall, ADC had a better diagnostic performance than morphological features, fractional anisotropy, and volume anisotropy. Diffusion tensor imagingderived diffusion metrics may be used to complement breast magnetic resonance imaging in the future after further standardization of the imaging parameters.

Citing Articles

Evaluating the added value of synthetic magnetic resonance imaging in predicting sentinel lymph node status in breast cancer.

Yang X, Lu Z, Tan X, Shao L, Shi J, Dou W Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024; 14(6):3789-3802.

PMID: 38846281 PMC: 11151255. DOI: 10.21037/qims-24-1.


Diffusion tensor imaging: survival analysis prediction in breast cancer patients.

Urut D, Karabulut D, Hereklioglu S, Ozdemir G, Cicin B, Hacioglu B Radiologie (Heidelb). 2024; 64(Suppl 1):54-59.

PMID: 38277036 DOI: 10.1007/s00117-023-01254-0.


Reliability of predicting low-burden (≤ 2) positive axillary lymph nodes indicating sentinel lymph node biopsy in primary operable breast cancer - a retrospective comparative study with PET/CT and breast MRI.

Sae-Lim C, Wu W, Chang M, Lai H, Chen S, Chou C World J Surg Oncol. 2024; 22(1):12.

PMID: 38183069 PMC: 10770957. DOI: 10.1186/s12957-023-03297-y.


Magnetic resonance imaging-guided radiofrequency ablation of breast cancer: a current state of the art review.

Zhang C, Shi J, Li B, Yu X, Feng X, Yang H Diagn Interv Radiol. 2023; 30(1):48-54.

PMID: 36971252 PMC: 10773175. DOI: 10.4274/dir.2022.221429.

References
1.
Partridge S, Ziadloo A, Murthy R, White S, Peacock S, Eby P . Diffusion tensor MRI: preliminary anisotropy measures and mapping of breast tumors. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2010; 31(2):339-47. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.22045. View

2.
Nissan N, Furman-Haran E, Feinberg-Shapiro M, Grobgeld D, Eyal E, Zehavi T . Tracking the mammary architectural features and detecting breast cancer with magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging. J Vis Exp. 2014; (94). PMC: 4396944. DOI: 10.3791/52048. View

3.
Marino M, Avendano D, Zapata P, Riedl C, Pinker K . Lymph Node Imaging in Patients with Primary Breast Cancer: Concurrent Diagnostic Tools. Oncologist. 2020; 25(2):e231-e242. PMC: 7011661. DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0427. View

4.
Kim W, Kim H, Lee S, Cho S, Shin K, Lee S . Preoperative axillary nodal staging with ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging: predictive values of quantitative and semantic features. Br J Radiol. 2018; 91(1092):20180507. PMC: 6319840. DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20180507. View

5.
Jiang R, Ma Z, Dong H, Sun S, Zeng X, Li X . Diffusion tensor imaging of breast lesions: evaluation of apparent diffusion coefficient and fractional anisotropy and tissue cellularity. Br J Radiol. 2016; 89(1064):20160076. PMC: 5124883. DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20160076. View