» Articles » PMID: 35949874

A Retrospective Review of Antiphospholipid Syndrome from a South Asian Country

Overview
Journal Arch Rheumatol
Specialty Rheumatology
Date 2022 Aug 11
PMID 35949874
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to investigate clinical presentations, antiphospholipid antibody patterns and their levels, therapeutic regimens, and outcomes in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) admitted to a tertiary care hospital of a South Asian country.

Patients And Methods: Between January 2009 and December 2019, a total of 216 patients with APS (8 males, 208 females; median age: 35.7±6.9 years; range, 20 to 76 years) who either fulfilled the modified Sydney criteria or those who satisfied only clinical criteria along with positive antiphospholipid antibody on at least one occasion (probable APS) were retrospectively analyzed.

Results: The majority of the patients (n=183, 84.7%) had obstetric complications, followed by venous thrombosis in 23 (10.8%) patients. Recurrent early abortions in 126 (58.6%) and deep venous thrombosis in 16 (7.4%) patients were the most prevalent obstetrical and venous events, respectively, whereas limb gangrene in seven (3.3%) and ischemic stroke in seven (3.3%) were the most common arterial events. A total of 190 (88%) patients had primary APS, while 26 (12%) had secondary APS. Systemic lupus erythematosus was the frequent association with secondary APS found in 19 (73%) patients. Immunoglobulin M (IgM) anticardiolipin antibody was present in 173 (65.0%) patients, being the most commonly reported antibody. Probable catastrophic APS was found in four (1.9%) patients. Majority of the patients (n=190, 87.9%) were treated with a combination of acetylsalicylic acid and low-molecular-weight heparin. Single mortality was observed in our study population due to complications related to catastrophic APS.

Conclusion: Antiphospholipid syndrome has a wide range of thrombotic and obstetrical manifestations with important variations in different regions of the world. There is a significant morbidity and mortality related to APS, despite treatment with anticoagulation and; therefore, describing prognostic markers and optimal therapeutic interventions is pivotal to prevent complications.

References
1.
Cervera R, Serrano R, Pons-Estel G, Ceberio-Hualde L, Shoenfeld Y, de Ramon E . Morbidity and mortality in the antiphospholipid syndrome during a 10-year period: a multicentre prospective study of 1000 patients. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014; 74(6):1011-8. DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204838. View

2.
White C, Thomason A, Boyd K . Role of Novel Oral Anticoagulants in the Treatment of Antiphospholipid Syndrome. Hosp Pharm. 2016; 51(9):759-767. PMC: 5080995. DOI: 10.1310/hpj5109-759. View

3.
Page J, Christiansen-Lindquist L, Thorsten V, Parker C, Reddy U, Dudley D . Diagnostic Tests for Evaluation of Stillbirth: Results From the Stillbirth Collaborative Research Network. Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 129(4):699-706. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001937. View

4.
Galli M, Luciani D, Bertolini G, Barbui T . Lupus anticoagulants are stronger risk factors for thrombosis than anticardiolipin antibodies in the antiphospholipid syndrome: a systematic review of the literature. Blood. 2002; 101(5):1827-32. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2002-02-0441. View

5.
Pengo V, Tripodi A, Reber G, Rand J, Ortel T, Galli M . Update of the guidelines for lupus anticoagulant detection. Subcommittee on Lupus Anticoagulant/Antiphospholipid Antibody of the Scientific and Standardisation Committee of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. J Thromb Haemost. 2009; 7(10):1737-40. DOI: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2009.03555.x. View