Comparison of Classifications and Indexes for Extraction Socket and Implant Supported Restoration in the Aesthetic Zone: a Systematic Review

Overview

Journal J Oral Maxillofac Res

Date 2022 Aug 11

PMID 35949544

Authors

Raviv Shamir

Povilas Daugela

Gintaras Juodzbalys

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objectives: The primary objective of the present systematic review is to test the hypothesis - the revision of the complexity of the extraction sockets morphology classifications will reveal the most important parameters for implant aesthetic and functional success in case of immediate dental implant placement in aesthetic zone. The secondary objective is to revise the most important parameters of aesthetic indexes created for implant-supported restoration in aesthetic zone.

Material And Methods: MEDLINE (PubMed) and Cochrane Library search in combination with hand-search of relevant journals was conducted including human studies published in English between 1 January 2005 and 1 February 2022. After evaluation of the titles and abstracts in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines, risk-of-bias assessment was evaluated and data was extracted from the full papers.

Results: Electronic and hand searching resulted in 477 entries. Five systematic reviews, research syntheses and 7 prospective studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the final data synthesis. Selected articles reported the different classifications complexity of the extraction sockets morphology and aesthetic indexes for implant supported restoration in aesthetic zone.

Conclusions: The most important parameters for implant aesthetics and functional success, incorporated in classifications of extraction sockets are facial soft tissue level and quality, gingival biotype, keratinized gingival, mesial and distal papillae appearance, buccal bone level and thickness, labial and buccal bone plates damage and bone lesions. The most important aesthetic indexes parameters are soft tissue contour position, including colour and texture, interdental papilla, mesial and distal interproximal bone height, gingival biotype.

Citing Articles

Alveolar ridge preservation and its impact on marginal bone level changes around dental implants: A retrospective, cohort comparative study.

Cinquini C, Izzetti R, Porreca A, Iezzi G, Nisi M, Barone A Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2024; 26(6):1162-1171.

PMID: 39161088 PMC: 11660527. DOI: 10.1111/cid.13379.

Attitudes of Oral Surgeons and Periodontists towards Immediate Dental Implant Placement.

Bineviciute Z, Juodzbalys G J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2024; 15(2):e3.

PMID: 39139358 PMC: 11318660. DOI: 10.5037/jomr.2024.15203.

References

Blanco J, Carral C, Argibay O, Linares A . Implant placement in fresh extraction sockets. Periodontol 2000. 2019; 79(1):151-167. DOI: 10.1111/prd.12253. View

Meng H, Chien E, Chien H . Immediate Implant Placement and Provisionalization in the Esthetic Zone: A 6.5-Year Follow-Up and Literature Review. Case Rep Dent. 2021; 2021:4290193. PMC: 8457954. DOI: 10.1155/2021/4290193. View

Chu S, Sarnachiaro G, Hochman M, Tarnow D . Subclassification and Clinical Management of Extraction Sockets with Labial Dentoalveolar Dehiscence Defects. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2015; 36(7):516, 518-20, 522 passim. View

Juodzbalys G, Stumbras A, Goyushov S, Duruel O, Tozum T . Morphological Classification of Extraction Sockets and Clinical Decision Tree for Socket Preservation/Augmentation after Tooth Extraction: a Systematic Review. J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2019; 10(3):e3. PMC: 6788426. DOI: 10.5037/jomr.2019.10303. View

Delben J, Coelho Goiato M, Gennari-Filho H, Assuncao W, Dos Santos D . Esthetics in implant-supported prostheses: a literature review. J Oral Implantol. 2011; 38(6):718-22. DOI: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-11-00086. View

Kazor C, Al-Shammari K, Sarment D, Misch C, Wang H . Implant plastic surgery: a review and rationale. J Oral Implantol. 2004; 30(4):240-54. DOI: 10.1563/0.637.1. View

Kim J, Ben Amara H, Chung I, Koo K . Compromised extraction sockets: a new classification and prevalence involving both soft and hard tissue loss. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2021; 51(2):100-113. PMC: 8090797. DOI: 10.5051/jpis.2005120256. View

Garber D, Salama M, Salama H . Immediate total tooth replacement. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2002; 22(3):210-6, 218. View

Forna N, Agop-Forna D . Esthetic aspects in implant-prosthetic rehabilitation. Med Pharm Rep. 2020; 92(Suppl No 3):S6-S13. PMC: 6978930. DOI: 10.15386/mpr-1515. View

10.

Juodzbalys G, Wang H . Soft and hard tissue assessment of immediate implant placement: a case series. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007; 18(2):237-43. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01312.x. View

11.

Fuentealba R, Jofre J . Esthetic failure in implant dentistry. Dent Clin North Am. 2014; 59(1):227-46. DOI: 10.1016/j.cden.2014.08.006. View

12.

Araujo M, Wennstrom J, Lindhe J . Modeling of the buccal and lingual bone walls of fresh extraction sites following implant installation. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006; 17(6):606-14. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01315.x. View

13.

Chen S, Darby I, Reynolds E . A prospective clinical study of non-submerged immediate implants: clinical outcomes and esthetic results. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007; 18(5):552-62. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01388.x. View

14.

Seyssens L, De Lat L, Cosyn J . Immediate implant placement with or without connective tissue graft: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Periodontol. 2020; 48(2):284-301. DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.13397. View

15.

Cardaropoli G, Lekholm U, Wennstrom J . Tissue alterations at implant-supported single-tooth replacements: a 1-year prospective clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006; 17(2):165-71. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01210.x. View

16.

Juodzbalys G, Wang H . Esthetic index for anterior maxillary implant-supported restorations. J Periodontol. 2010; 81(1):34-42. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2009.090385. View

17.

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman D . Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009; 6(7):e1000097. PMC: 2707599. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097. View

18.

Hammerle C, Tarnow D . The etiology of hard- and soft-tissue deficiencies at dental implants: A narrative review. J Periodontol. 2018; 89 Suppl 1:S291-S303. DOI: 10.1002/JPER.16-0810. View

19.

Cho Y, Moon S, Chung C, Kim H . Resorption of labial bone in maxillary anterior implant. J Adv Prosthodont. 2011; 3(2):85-9. PMC: 3141124. DOI: 10.4047/jap.2011.3.2.85. View

20.

Brito C, Tenenbaum H, Wong B, Schmitt C, Nogueira-Filho G . Is keratinized mucosa indispensable to maintain peri-implant health? A systematic review of the literature. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2013; 102(3):643-50. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.33042. View