» Articles » PMID: 35948275

Quantifying the Benefits of Remission Duration in Focal and Segmental Glomerulosclerosis

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Although the clinical benefit of obtaining a remission in proteinuria in nephrotic patients with focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) is recognized, the long-term value of maintaining it and the impact of relapses on outcome are not well described.

Methods: We examined the impact of remissions and relapses on either a 50% decline in kidney function or end-stage kidney disease (combined event) using time-dependent and landmark analyses in a retrospective study of all patients from the Toronto Glomerulonephritis Registry with biopsy-proven FSGS, established nephrotic-range proteinuria and at least one remission.

Results: In the 203 FSGS individuals with a remission, 89 never relapsed and 114 experienced at least one relapse. The first recurrence was often followed by a repeating pattern of remission and relapse. The 10-year survival from a combined event was 15% higher in those with no relapse versus those with any relapse. This smaller than anticipated difference was related to the favourable outcome in individuals whose relapses quickly remitted. Relapsers who ultimately ended in remission (n = 46) versus in relapse (n = 68) experienced a 91% and 32% 7-year event survival (P < .001), respectively. Using time-varying survival analyses that considered all periods of remission and relapse in every patient and adjusting for each period's initial estimated glomerular filtration rate, the state of relapse was associated with a 2.17 (95% confidence interval 1.32-3.58; P = .002) greater risk of experiencing a combined event even in this FSGS remission cohort.

Conclusion: In FSGS, unless remissions are maintained and relapses avoided, long-term renal survival remains poor. Treatment strategies addressing remission duration remain poorly defined and should be an essential question in future trials.

Citing Articles

The paradox of eGFR trends and kidney failure incidence in patients without monogenic kidney disorders. Reply.

Elliott M, Kiryluk K, Gharavi A J Clin Invest. 2024; 134(24).

PMID: 39680462 PMC: 11645133. DOI: 10.1172/JCI187783.


Increased risk of kidney failure in patients with genetic kidney disorders.

Elliott M, Vena N, Marasa M, Cocchi E, Bheda S, Bogyo K J Clin Invest. 2024; 134(17).

PMID: 39225089 PMC: 11364380. DOI: 10.1172/JCI178573.


Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis: Assessing the Risk of Relapse.

Troyanov S, Jauhal A, Reich H, Hladunewich M, Cattran D Kidney Int Rep. 2023; 8(11):2403-2415.

PMID: 38025232 PMC: 10658237. DOI: 10.1016/j.ekir.2023.08.035.


Implications of Complete Proteinuria Remission at any Time in Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis: Sparsentan DUET Trial.

Trachtman H, Diva U, Murphy E, Wang K, Inrig J, Komers R Kidney Int Rep. 2023; 8(10):2017-2028.

PMID: 37850006 PMC: 10577371. DOI: 10.1016/j.ekir.2023.07.022.

References
1.
Troyanov S, Wall C, Miller J, Scholey J, Cattran D . Focal and segmental glomerulosclerosis: definition and relevance of a partial remission. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005; 16(4):1061-8. DOI: 10.1681/ASN.2004070593. View

2.
Kitiyakara C, Eggers P, Kopp J . Twenty-one-year trend in ESRD due to focal segmental glomerulosclerosis in the United States. Am J Kidney Dis. 2004; 44(5):815-25. View

3.
Sim J, Batech M, Hever A, Harrison T, Avelar T, Kanter M . Distribution of Biopsy-Proven Presumed Primary Glomerulonephropathies in 2000-2011 Among a Racially and Ethnically Diverse US Population. Am J Kidney Dis. 2016; 68(4):533-544. DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2016.03.416. View

4.
Meijers B, Maas R, Sprangers B, Claes K, Poesen R, Bammens B . The soluble urokinase receptor is not a clinical marker for focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. Kidney Int. 2014; 85(3):636-40. DOI: 10.1038/ki.2013.505. View

5.
Deegens J, Dijkman H, Borm G, Steenbergen E, van den Berg J, Weening J . Podocyte foot process effacement as a diagnostic tool in focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. Kidney Int. 2008; 74(12):1568-76. DOI: 10.1038/ki.2008.413. View