» Articles » PMID: 35947993

The Phase II Study of Panitumumab in Chemotherapy-Naïve Frail or Elderly Patients with RAS Wild-type Colorectal Cancer: OGSG 1602 Final Results

Abstract

Background: We previously reported the response rate of a phase II OGSG1602 study on panitumumab in chemotherapy-naive frail or elderly patients with RAS wild-type unresectable colorectal cancer (CRC) [Terazawa T, Kato T, Goto M, et al. Oncologist. 2021;26(1):17]. Herein, we report a survival analysis.

Methods: Patients aged ≥65 years and considered unsuitable for intensive chemotherapy or aged ≥76 years were enrolled. Primary tumors located from the cecum to the transverse colon were considered right-sided tumors (RSTs); those located from the splenic flexure to the rectum were considered left-sided tumors (LSTs).

Results: Among the 36 enrolled patients, 34 were included in the efficacy analysis, with 26 and 8 having LSTs and RSTs, respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 6.0 [95% CI, 5.4-10.0] and 17.5 months (95% CI, 13.8-24.3), respectively. Although no significant differences existed in PFS between patients with LST and RST {6.6 (95% CI, 5.4-11.5) vs. 4.9 months [95% CI, 1.9-not available (NA), P = .120]}, there were significant differences in OS [19.3 (95% CI, 14.2-NA) vs.12.3 months (95% CI, 9.9-NA), P = .043].

Conclusion: Panitumumab showed favorable OS in frail or elderly patients with RAS wild-type CRC and no prior exposure to chemotherapy. Panitumumab may be optimal for patients with LSTs (UMIN Clinical Trials Registry Number UMIN000024528).

Citing Articles

An Update on the Role of Anti-EGFR in the Treatment of Older Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

Rosati G, Montrone M, Pacilio C, Colombo A, Cicero G, Paragliola F J Clin Med. 2022; 11(23).

PMID: 36498683 PMC: 9739901. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11237108.

References
1.
Cunningham D, Lang I, Marcuello E, Lorusso V, Ocvirk J, Shin D . Bevacizumab plus capecitabine versus capecitabine alone in elderly patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer (AVEX): an open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013; 14(11):1077-1085. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70154-2. View

2.
Sastre J, Massuti B, Pulido G, Guillen-Ponce C, Benavides M, Manzano J . First-line single-agent panitumumab in frail elderly patients with wild-type KRAS metastatic colorectal cancer and poor prognostic factors: A phase II study of the Spanish Cooperative Group for the Treatment of Digestive Tumours. Eur J Cancer. 2015; 51(11):1371-80. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.04.013. View

3.
Yamada Y, Denda T, Gamoh M, Iwanaga I, Yuki S, Shimodaira H . S-1 and irinotecan plus bevacizumab versus mFOLFOX6 or CapeOX plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (TRICOLORE): a randomized, open-label, phase III, noninferiority trial. Ann Oncol. 2018; 29(3):624-631. PMC: 5889030. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx816. View

4.
Perkins N, Schisterman E . The inconsistency of "optimal" cutpoints obtained using two criteria based on the receiver operating characteristic curve. Am J Epidemiol. 2006; 163(7):670-5. PMC: 1444894. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwj063. View

5.
van Leersum N, Janssen-Heijnen M, Wouters M, Rutten H, Coebergh J, Tollenaar R . Increasing prevalence of comorbidity in patients with colorectal cancer in the South of the Netherlands 1995-2010. Int J Cancer. 2012; 132(9):2157-63. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.27871. View