Frailty Syndrome and Risks for Falling in the Elderly Community
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Purpose: To identify the prevalence of Frailty Syndrome in the elderly and the relationship with risk of falling.
Methods: Descriptive, cross-sectional, and analytical clinical study. One hundred and one volunteers over 60 years old were submitted to audiological evaluation, Dynamic Gait Index - Brazilian brief (DGI), Timed Up and Go (TUG) and Edmonton Fragility Scale (EFE) that verified, respectively, hearing thresholds, frailty syndrome, functional and dynamic balance, and risk of falling. The simple percentual distribution, the Wilcoxon´s test and the Bivariate Correlation with Pearson's coefficient were used for statistical analysis. Limits equal to or less than 1.0 and 5.0% were adopted.
Results: EFE identified 22.8% of volunteers as fragile and 22.8% as vulnerable. DGI and TUG found 34.6% and 84.1% of at risk for falls, respectively. Significant correlations between EFE and DGI (p <0.01), EFE and TUG (p <0.01), and DGI and TUG (p <0.01) were observed. Pearson's coefficient between EFE and DGI, EFE and TUG, and DGI and TUG were -0.26, -0.41, and 0.46, respectively. An association between DGI and TUG and age (p <0.01) was identified. No correlation between EFE and sex or age was found.
Conclusion: Frailty and pre-frailty were identified in a significant segment of the volunteers, especially in the oldest subjects. Functional and dynamic balance were moderately correlated with frailty, which demonstrated that frailty syndrome increases the risk of falls.
Prevalence and risk factors of pre-frailty and frailty in hemodialysis patients in central China.
Jiang S, Zhou Y, Zhang N, Zhang S, Xie Y, Qiu Q Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):30660.
PMID: 39730458 PMC: 11680988. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-79855-5.
Predictive ability of Achilles tendon elastography for frailty in older adults.
Ceker E, Fadiloglu A, Cataltepe E, Sendur H, Allahverdiyeva S, Varan H Eur Geriatr Med. 2024; 15(5):1461-1468.
PMID: 39090315 PMC: 11615014. DOI: 10.1007/s41999-024-01023-9.
Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on science communication.
Navas A, Lunardelo P, Lemos S, Ribeiro V, Lopes L Codas. 2024; 36(2):e20240068.
PMID: 38695433 PMC: 11086976. DOI: 10.1590/2317-1782/20242024068pt.
Freire I, Seixas A Front Physiol. 2024; 15:1309161.
PMID: 38694207 PMC: 11061438. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2024.1309161.
Lee H, Arai I, Kwon S Nutrients. 2024; 16(5).
PMID: 38474849 PMC: 10934365. DOI: 10.3390/nu16050721.