» Articles » PMID: 35941322

Usefulness of the Vall D'Hebron Risk Score to Stratify the Risk of Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy

Overview
Journal J Nucl Cardiol
Date 2022 Aug 8
PMID 35941322
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: To evaluate the Vall d'Hebron-Risk-Score (VH-RS) to stratify the risk of patients with stable ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM), and assess whether hemoglobin (Hb) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) provide additional information to the VH-RS.

Methods And Results: We analysed 673 consecutive patients with ICM who underwent gated SPECT. According to VH-RS, we stratified patients into 4-risk-levels: very-low-risk (VLR), low-risk (LR), moderate-risk (MR), and high-risk (HRi). We considered as MACEs: non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), heart failure hospitalization (HF), coronary revascularization (CR), and cardiac death (CD). Also the cardiac-resynchronization-therapy (CRT), and the implantable-cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) were investigated. During the follow-up (4.8 ± 2.7 years), 379 patients had MACEs (0.18/patient/year). There were no patients in VLR and LR. All patients were reclassified in 3-risk-levels (MRi = 48; HRi = 121; VHRi[very high risk] = 504). Most patients with MACEs were in VHRi level (test-for-trend: MACEs ≥ 1 without CRT/ICD, P < .001; combined non-fatal MI, CD and CR, P < .001; MACEs ≥ 1 with CRT/ICD, P < .001). The Hb and eGFR values do not properly improve the risk stratification obtained by the VH-RS (global-NRI[net-reclassification-improvement] was: (MACEs ≥ 1 without CRT/ICD: - 10.6%; non-fatal MI, CD and CR: - 9.08%; and MACEs ≥ 1 with CRT/ICD: - 8.85%).

Conclusion: VH-RS is effective in evaluating risk of patients with stable ICM. In our population, adding Hb and eGFR variables do not improve the performance of the VH-RS.

Citing Articles

Vall d'Hebron Risk Score II for myocardial infarction and cardiac death.

Romero-Farina G, Aguade-Bruix S, Ferreira Gonzalez I Open Heart. 2023; 10(2).

PMID: 37935561 PMC: 10632909. DOI: 10.1136/openhrt-2023-002431.

References
1.
Candell-Riera J, Romero-Farina G, Aguade-Bruix S, Castell-Conesa J, Leon G, Garcia-Dorado D . Prognostic value of myocardial perfusion-gated SPECT in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. J Nucl Cardiol. 2009; 16(2):212-21. DOI: 10.1007/s12350-008-9042-0. View

2.
Zelt J, Wang J, Mielniczuk L, Beanlands R, Fallavollita J, Canty Jr J . Positron Emission Tomography Imaging of Regional Versus Global Myocardial Sympathetic Activity to Improve Risk Stratification in Patients With Ischemic Cardiomyopathy. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021; 14(6):e012549. PMC: 8208501. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.121.012549. View

3.
AlJaroudi W, Alraies M, Menon V, Brunken R, Cerqueira M, Jaber W . Predictors and incremental prognostic value of left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony response during stress-gated positron emission tomography in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. J Nucl Cardiol. 2012; 19(5):958-69. DOI: 10.1007/s12350-012-9592-z. View

4.
Chery G, Kamp N, Kosinski A, Sanders Schmidler G, Lopes R, Patel M . Prognostic value of myocardial fibrosis on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy: A systematic review. Am Heart J. 2020; 229:52-60. PMC: 7417269. DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2020.08.004. View

5.
Lee C, Hung K, Chen C, Chu C, Hsieh M, Chang P . A novel echocardiographic parameter for predicting the ischemic etiology of cardiomyopathy and its prognosis in patients with congestive heart failure. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2011; 24(12):1349-57. DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2011.08.020. View