Phase II Study of Afatinib in Patients With Tumors With Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Activating Mutations: Results From the National Cancer Institute-Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice ECOG-ACRIN Trial (EAY131) Subprotocol EAY131-B
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Purpose: National Cancer Institute-Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice is a multicohort trial that assigns patients with advanced cancers to targeted therapies on the basis of central tumor genomic testing. Arm B evaluated afatinib, an ErbB family tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in patients with -activating mutations.
Methods: Eligible patients had selected single-nucleotide variants or insertions/deletions detected by the National Cancer Institute-Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice next-generation sequencing assay. Patients had performance status ≤ 1, left ventricular ejection fraction > 50%, grade ≤ 1 diarrhea, and no prior human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) therapy. Patients received afatinib 40 mg once daily in 28-day cycles. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR). Secondary end points were 6-month progression-free survival, overall survival, toxicity, and molecular correlates.
Results: A total of 59 patients were assigned and 40 were enrolled. The median age was 62 years, 78% were female, 68% had performance status = 1, and 58% had received > 3 prior therapies. The confirmed ORR was 2.7% (n = 1 of 37; 90% CI, 0.14 to 12.2), and 6-month progression-free survival was 12.0% (90% CI, 5.6 to 25.8). A confirmed partial response occurred in a patient with adenocarcinoma of extra-mammary Paget disease of skin who progressed after cycle 6. Two unconfirmed partial responses were observed (low-grade serous gynecological tract and estrogen receptor-positive/HER2-negative immunohistochemistry breast ductal carcinoma). Of 12 patients with breast cancer, 1 additional patient with lobular carcinoma (estrogen receptor-positive/HER2 fluorescent in situ hybridization) had a 51% reduction in target lesions but progressed because of a new lesion at cycle 6. The most common (> 20%) treatment-related adverse events were diarrhea (68%), mucositis (43%), fatigue (40%), acneiform rash (30%), dehydration (27%), vomiting (27%), nausea (27%), anemia (27%), and anorexia (22%). Four patients (11%) discontinued because of adverse events.
Conclusion: Although afatinib did not meet the prespecified threshold for antitumor activity in this heavily pretreated cohort, the response in a rare tumor type is notable. The safety profile of afatinib was consistent with prior studies.
Testi I, Giudice G, Salfi G, Pedrani M, Merler S, Turco F Explor Target Antitumor Ther. 2025; 5(6):1326-1364.
PMID: 39764422 PMC: 11702265. DOI: 10.37349/etat.2024.00279.
Ha H, Lee H, Kim J, Kim D, An H, Bae S Cancer Res Treat. 2024; 56(4):991-1013.
PMID: 38726510 PMC: 11491240. DOI: 10.4143/crt.2024.128.
Eturi A, Bhasin A, Zarrabi K, Tester W Molecules. 2024; 29(8).
PMID: 38675715 PMC: 11054340. DOI: 10.3390/molecules29081896.
Genomic Profiling and Molecular Characterisation of Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma.
Pezzicoli G, Ciciriello F, Musci V, Minei S, Biasi A, Ragno A Medicina (Kaunas). 2024; 60(4).
PMID: 38674231 PMC: 11052409. DOI: 10.3390/medicina60040585.
Aleksakhina S, Ivantsov A, Imyanitov E Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(7).
PMID: 38612902 PMC: 11012409. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25074094.