» Articles » PMID: 35939236

Risk Factors for Poor Response to Denosumab Treatment in Japanese Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis

Overview
Specialty Endocrinology
Date 2022 Aug 8
PMID 35939236
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Denosumab has been reported to increase bone mineral density (BMD) and suppress fractures, but poor responders are not uncommon. This study aimed to identify risk factors for poor response to denosumab treatment. This is the first study to explore risk factors for poor response to denosumab.

Materials And Methods: This retrospective observational study investigated 227 Japanese postmenopausal women who received denosumab with monitoring of BMD by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry at 6-month intervals. Risk factors were identified using Cox's proportional hazard modeling. Poor responders were defined as not exceeding the least significant change of BMD from baseline for 3 years.

Results: Mean relative change from baseline for 3 years in lumbar spine (LS)-BMD, femoral neck (FN)-BMD, and total hip (TH)-BMD were 12.6%, 6.8%, and 6.1%, respectively. Numbers of poor responders were 10 in LS-BMD, 47 in FN-BMD, 38 in TH-BMD. Risk factors for poor response were concomitant glucocorticoid use for LS-BMD, low body mass index or initiation at higher BMD for FN-BMD, and pretreatment with bisphosphonates or initiation at higher BMD for TH-BMD.

Conclusion: Risk factors for insufficient denosumab effect differed between BMD measurement sites. These results should be taken into consideration when selecting denosumab in clinical practice.

Citing Articles

Risk factors for nonresponse to 2 years of denosumab administration in patients with osteoporosis: A retrospective single-center cohorts study.

Yamamoto A, Nagao M, Nishizaki Y, Maeda E, Ishijima M Health Sci Rep. 2024; 7(4):e1993.

PMID: 38585014 PMC: 10995440. DOI: 10.1002/hsr2.1993.


Zinc improves Denosumab and eldecalcitol efficacy for bone mineral density in patients with hypozincemia.

Ishizu H, Shimizu T, Ohashi Y, Kusunoki K, Kanayama M, Iwasaki N J Bone Miner Metab. 2024; 42(2):233-241.

PMID: 38324176 DOI: 10.1007/s00774-024-01498-3.

References
1.
McCombs J, Thiebaud P, McLaughlin-Miley C, Shi J . Compliance with drug therapies for the treatment and prevention of osteoporosis. Maturitas. 2004; 48(3):271-87. DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2004.02.005. View

2.
Imaz I, Zegarra P, Gonzalez-Enriquez J, Rubio B, Alcazar R, Amate J . Poor bisphosphonate adherence for treatment of osteoporosis increases fracture risk: systematic review and meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int. 2009; 21(11):1943-51. DOI: 10.1007/s00198-009-1134-4. View

3.
Sampalis J, Adachi J, Rampakakis E, Vaillancourt J, Karellis A, Kindundu C . Long-term impact of adherence to oral bisphosphonates on osteoporotic fracture incidence. J Bone Miner Res. 2011; 27(1):202-10. DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.533. View

4.
McClung M, Lewiecki E, Cohen S, Bolognese M, Woodson G, Moffett A . Denosumab in postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density. N Engl J Med. 2006; 354(8):821-31. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa044459. View

5.
Kamimura M, Nakamura Y, Ikegami S, Uchiyama S, Kato H, Taguchi A . Significant improvement of bone mineral density and bone turnover markers by denosumab therapy in bisphosphonate-unresponsive patients. Osteoporos Int. 2016; 28(2):559-566. PMC: 5269470. DOI: 10.1007/s00198-016-3764-7. View