» Articles » PMID: 35939232

Is Development in Bariatric Surgery in Germany Compatible with International Standards? A Review of 16 years of Data

Overview
Journal Updates Surg
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2022 Aug 8
PMID 35939232
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Bariatric surgery has expanded tremendously internationally over the past decade. In recent years, bariatric surgery has experienced a significant growth in Germany. However, the question arises as to whether this development is in line with international developments or whether there is still room for improvement that could be challenged. 63,990 primary bariatric procedures recorded in the German Bariatric Surgery Registry (GBSR) were analyzed from 2005 to April 2021. The distribution of procedures according to different variants was analyzed and presented. In the last 16 years, 17 different procedures have been performed. The most common surgical procedure was sleeve gastrectomy (SG), followed by Roux-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) (42%). Adjustable gastric banding (AGB) has declined over time, from 23.5% in the first 5 years to 0.2% in recent years. In comparison, omega-loop gastric bypass has increased over the past 5 years (from 0.4% in the first 5 years to 5.9% in the last 5 years). Laparoscopic procedures have accounted for 96.4% of all bariatric surgeries in recent years. The frequency of some procedures has decreased and some bariatric procedures have lost significance. Overall, bariatric surgery in Germany has developed positively compared to the international trend. Nevertheless, there is one area that needs to be optimized: the development of robotic bariatric surgery, which crawls behind in Germany compared to other countries. To establish the technology in bariatric surgery in a timely manner, a balance must be found between cost neutrality and patient-oriented applications.

Citing Articles

Evaluation of the effect of sleeve gastrectomy versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in patients with morbid obesity: multicenter comparative study.

Thaher O, Wollenhaupt F, Croner R, Hukauf M, Stroh C Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024; 409(1):156.

PMID: 38730065 PMC: 11087333. DOI: 10.1007/s00423-024-03341-9.


Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) in the evaluation of liver steatosis: data reliability in different respiratory phases and body positions.

Rocca A, Komici K, Brunese M, Pacella G, Avella P, Di Benedetto C Radiol Med. 2024; 129(4):549-557.

PMID: 38512608 PMC: 11021279. DOI: 10.1007/s11547-024-01786-y.


Psychometric Properties of the WBIS/M in a Representative Prebariatric Sample: Evidence for an Improved 10-Item Version.

Schraven S, Hubner C, Eichler J, Mansfeld T, Sander J, Seyfried F Obes Facts. 2024; 17(4):329-337.

PMID: 38350429 PMC: 11299967. DOI: 10.1159/000537689.


Psychological well-being as a motive for and result of post-bariatric body contouring procedures.

Pehlke B, Oliveira F, Varnava C, Nehls F, Wiebringhaus P, Kueckelhaus M Obes Sci Pract. 2024; 10(1):e719.

PMID: 38263992 PMC: 10804339. DOI: 10.1002/osp4.719.


Evolution of Bariatric Surgery in Italy in the Last 11 Years: Data from the SICOB Yearly National Survey.

Gentileschi P, Sensi B, Siragusa L, Sorge R, Rispoli E, Angrisani L Obes Surg. 2023; 33(3):930-937.

PMID: 36690866 PMC: 9871429. DOI: 10.1007/s11695-022-06435-9.

References
1.
Zeng Z, Sun J, Kang W . [History, Recent Advancements, and Prospects in Bariatric/Metabolic Surgery]. Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao. 2018; 40(5):581-590. DOI: 10.3881/j.issn.1000-503X.10804. View

2.
Colquitt J, Pickett K, Loveman E, Frampton G . Surgery for weight loss in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014; (8):CD003641. PMC: 9028049. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003641.pub4. View

3.
Gospodarevskaya E, Picot J, Cooper K, Loveman E, Takeda A . Ustekinumab for the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis. Health Technol Assess. 2009; 13 Suppl 3:61-6. DOI: 10.3310/hta13suppl3/10. View