» Articles » PMID: 35939178

Placebo Administration for Dry Eye Disease: a Level I Evidence Based Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialties Pharmacology
Pharmacy
Date 2022 Aug 8
PMID 35939178
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The efficacy of various common treatment options for dry eye disease (DED) has been investigated against placebo. However, the potential beneficial effect of placebo in the management of DED is still unclear.

Aim: This meta-analysis investigated the impact of placebo administration in DED in Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI), Schirmer I test (SIT), tear breakup time (TBUT), corneal staining, and complications.

Method: This meta-analysis and systematic review was conducted according to the 2020 PRISMA guidelines. In March 2022, Pubmed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Embase were accessed. All the randomised clinical trials which investigated any active treatment against a placebo control group were considered. The following data were extracted at baseline and at last follow-up: Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI), tear breakup time test (TBUT), Schirmer I test (SIT), corneal staining.

Results: Data from 56 studies (12,205 patients) were retrieved. Placebo administration is not effective in improving TBUT (P = 0.3), OSDI (P = 0.2), SIT (P = 0.1) and corneal staining (P = 0.1) from baseline to last follow-up. Active treatment led to a higher TBUT and SIT compared to placebo administration (P < 0.0001). The active treatment resulted in a lower OSDI compared to placebo administration (P = 0.0005). Five studies reported data on the corneal staining. No difference was found between placebo administration and active treatment (P = 0.8).

Conclusion: Placebo administration does not impact symptoms of DED and can be successfully employed to evaluate the efficacy of active treatments.

Citing Articles

Two-Year Progression of Dry Eye Disease in Dry Eye Assessment and Management Study.

Lee D, Guo M, Yu Y, Bunya V, Asbell P, Ying G Cornea. 2024; 43(10):1231-1237.

PMID: 38391283 PMC: 11339235. DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000003503.


Effects of Carboxymethylcellulose Artificial Tears on Ocular Surface Microbiome Diversity and Composition, A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Zhou Y, Sidhu G, Whitlock J, Abdelmalik B, Mayer Z, Li Y Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2023; 12(8):5.

PMID: 37555738 PMC: 10424155. DOI: 10.1167/tvst.12.8.5.


Chloroquine and Hydroxychloroquine in the Treatment of Dry Eye Disease.

Prinz J, Maffulli N, Fuest M, Walter P, Hildebrand F, Migliorini F Diseases. 2023; 11(2).

PMID: 37366873 PMC: 10297605. DOI: 10.3390/diseases11020085.


Possible Strategies to Mitigate Placebo or Vehicle Response in Dry Eye Disease Trials: A Narrative Review.

Montecchi-Palmer M, Wu M, Rolando M, Lau C, Perez Quinones V, Dana R Ophthalmol Ther. 2023; 12(4):1827-1849.

PMID: 37208548 PMC: 10287883. DOI: 10.1007/s40123-023-00720-1.

References
1.
Alshamrani A, Almousa A, Almulhim A, Alafaleq A, Alosaimi M, Alqahtani A . Prevalence and Risk Factors of Dry Eye Symptoms in a Saudi Arabian Population. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2017; 24(2):67-73. PMC: 5598305. DOI: 10.4103/meajo.MEAJO_281_16. View

2.
Craig J, Nelson J, Azar D, Belmonte C, Bron A, Chauhan S . TFOS DEWS II Report Executive Summary. Ocul Surf. 2017; 15(4):802-812. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtos.2017.08.003. View

3.
Craig J, Nichols K, Akpek E, Caffery B, Dua H, Joo C . TFOS DEWS II Definition and Classification Report. Ocul Surf. 2017; 15(3):276-283. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtos.2017.05.008. View

4.
Ohashi Y, Ishida R, Kojima T, Goto E, Matsumoto Y, Watanabe K . Abnormal protein profiles in tears with dry eye syndrome. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003; 136(2):291-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9394(03)00203-4. View

5.
Javadi M, Feizi S . Dry eye syndrome. J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2012; 6(3):192-8. PMC: 3306104. View