» Articles » PMID: 35939133

Perceptions of Fracture and Fall Risk and of the Benefits and Barriers to Exercise in Adults with Diabetes

Overview
Journal Osteoporos Int
Date 2022 Aug 8
PMID 35939133
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of the study was to assess the perceptions of fracture and fall risk, and the perceived benefits of and barriers to exercise in adults ≥ 50 years old living with type 1 (T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D).

Methods: Participants were recruited through social media and from medical clinics and invited to complete a self-administered online survey, comprising 38 close-ended questions and 4 open-ended questions.

Results: A total of 446 participants completed the survey: 38% T1D, 59% T2D, and 3% with unreported diabetes type. Most participants did not believe that having diabetes increased their risk of fractures (81%) nor falls (68%), and more than 90% reported having not been informed about diabetes-related fracture risk by their physicians. Among exercise types, participation in moderate aerobic exercise was most common (54%), while only 31%, 32%, and 37% of participants engaged in strenuous aerobic, resistance, and balance/flexibility exercise, respectively. The most prevalent barrier to exercise for both T1D and T2D was a lack of motivation, reported by 54% of participants. Lack of time and fear of hypoglycemia were common exercise barriers reported by participants with T1D. Most participants owned a smart phone (69%), tablet (60%), or computer (56%), and 46% expressed an interest in partaking in virtually delivered exercise programs.

Conclusions: Adults living with diabetes have limited awareness of increased fall and fracture risk. These risks are insufficiently highlighted by health care providers; strategies to overcome perceived exercise barriers and exercise programs optimized for bone health should be implemented.

Citing Articles

Perspectives of nurses and patients on the misplacement of supportive care information for type 2 diabetes mellitus: a qualitative study in China.

Li Y, Li C, Zhou N, Fan R, Nie L, Wu F BMC Nurs. 2025; 24(1):123.

PMID: 39901206 PMC: 11792742. DOI: 10.1186/s12912-025-02783-w.


Evaluating compliance with the care standard of proactively assessing bone health in patients with diabetes: a pilot audit of practice across Asia by the Asia Pacific Consortium on Osteoporosis (APCO).

Chandran M, Aftab N, Amin A, Amphansap T, Bhadada S, Chadha M Arch Osteoporos. 2024; 19(1):48.

PMID: 38862849 PMC: 11166814. DOI: 10.1007/s11657-024-01399-y.


Walking Attenuates Postprandial Glycemic Response: What Else Can We Do without Leaving Home or the Office?.

Bellini A, Nicolo A, Rocchi J, Bazzucchi I, Sacchetti M Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20(1).

PMID: 36612575 PMC: 9819328. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20010253.

References
1.
Abdulameer S, Sahib M, Syed Sulaiman S, Hassali M . A comprehensive view of knowledge and osteoporosis status among type 2 diabetes mellitus in Malaysia: A cross sectional study. Pharm Pract (Granada). 2020; 17(4):1636. PMC: 6935538. DOI: 10.18549/PharmPract.2019.4.1636. View

2.
Lascar N, Kennedy A, Hancock B, Jenkins D, Andrews R, Greenfield S . Attitudes and barriers to exercise in adults with type 1 diabetes (T1DM) and how best to address them: a qualitative study. PLoS One. 2014; 9(9):e108019. PMC: 4169586. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108019. View

3.
Qiu S, Cai X, Chen X, Yang B, Sun Z . Step counter use in type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Med. 2014; 12:36. PMC: 4016223. DOI: 10.1186/1741-7015-12-36. View

4.
Colberg S, Sigal R, Yardley J, Riddell M, Dunstan D, Dempsey P . Physical Activity/Exercise and Diabetes: A Position Statement of the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care. 2016; 39(11):2065-2079. PMC: 6908414. DOI: 10.2337/dc16-1728. View

5.
Chapman A, Meyer C, Renehan E, Hill K, Browning C . Exercise interventions for the improvement of falls-related outcomes among older adults with diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analyses. J Diabetes Complications. 2016; 31(3):631-645. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2016.09.015. View