» Articles » PMID: 35938931

Role of Bank Vole (Myodes Glareolus) Personality on Tick Burden (Ixodes Spp.)

Overview
Specialty Parasitology
Date 2022 Aug 8
PMID 35938931
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Parasitism among individuals in a population often varies more than expected by chance only, leading to parasite aggregation, which is a parameter of paramount importance in parasite population dynamics and particularly in vector-borne epidemiology. However, the origin of this phenomenon is yet not fully elucidated. An increasing body of literature has demonstrated that individuals vary consistently in their behaviour, which is referred to as animal personality. Such behavioural variation could potentially lead to different encounter rates with parasites. To test this hypothesis, the relationship between personality and burden with ticks (Ixodes spp.) in the bank vole, Myodes glareolus (Schreber), was assessed. Wild rodents (eight females and 18 males) were live-trapped, identified, sexed, weighted, and inspected for ticks. Behavioural profiling was then performed using standardised tests measuring activity/exploration and boldness with a combination of automatically and manually recorded behavioural variables summarised using multivariate analyses. The resulting personality descriptors and questing tick variables were used as explanatory variables in negative binomial generalised linear models of tick burden and Bayesian simulations were performed to better estimate coefficients. Tick burden was associated to body mass and sex, but not to personality descriptors, which was mainly associated to activity/exploration. These results are discussed regarding the complex relationships among individual personality, physiological status, space use and health status.

Citing Articles

Individual heterogeneity in ixodid tick infestation and prevalence of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato in a northern community of small mammalian hosts.

Lindso L, Anders J, Viljugrein H, Herland A, Stigum V, Easterday W Oecologia. 2023; 203(3-4):421-433.

PMID: 37955713 PMC: 10684702. DOI: 10.1007/s00442-023-05476-w.

References
1.
Arriero E, Wanelik K, Birtles R, Bradley J, Jackson J, Paterson S . From the animal house to the field: Are there consistent individual differences in immunological profile in wild populations of field voles (Microtus agrestis)?. PLoS One. 2017; 12(8):e0183450. PMC: 5560671. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183450. View

2.
Beldomenico P, Telfer S, Gebert S, Lukomski L, Bennett M, Begon M . The dynamics of health in wild field vole populations: a haematological perspective. J Anim Ecol. 2008; 77(5):984-97. PMC: 2980900. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2008.01413.x. View

3.
Beldomenico P, Telfer S, Gebert S, Lukomski L, Bennett M, Begon M . The vicious circle and infection intensity: the case of Trypanosoma microti in field vole populations. Epidemics. 2011; 1(3):162-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.epidem.2009.05.002. View

4.
Bello-Arroyo E, Roque H, Marcos A, Orihuel J, Higuera-Matas A, Desco M . MouBeAT: A New and Open Toolbox for Guided Analysis of Behavioral Tests in Mice. Front Behav Neurosci. 2018; 12:201. PMC: 6137138. DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00201. View

5.
Boratynski Z, Szyrmer M, Koteja P . The metabolic performance predicts home range size of bank voles: a support for the behavioral-bioenergetics theory. Oecologia. 2020; 193(3):547-556. DOI: 10.1007/s00442-020-04704-x. View