» Articles » PMID: 35938378

Citation Bias, Diversity, and Ethics

Overview
Journal Account Res
Publisher Informa Healthcare
Specialty Medical Ethics
Date 2022 Aug 8
PMID 35938378
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

How often a researcher is cited usually plays a decisive role in that person's career advancement, because academic institutions often use citation metrics, either explicitly or implicitly, to estimate research impact and productivity. Research has shown, however, that citation patterns and practices are affected by various biases, including the prestige of the authors being cited and their gender, race, and nationality, whether self-attested or perceived. Some commentators have proposed that researchers can address biases related to social identity or position by including a Citation Diversity Statement in a manuscript submitted for publication. A Citation Diversity Statement is a paragraph placed before the reference section of a manuscript in which the authors address the diversity and equitability of their references in terms of gender, race, ethnicity, or other factors and affirm a commitment to promoting equity and diversity in sources and references. The present commentary considers arguments in favor of Citation Diversity Statements, and some practical and ethical issues that these statements raise.

Citing Articles

Data reuse in agricultural genomics research: challenges and recommendations.

Hafner A, DeLeo V, Deng C, Elsik C, S Fleming D, Harrison P Gigascience. 2025; 14.

PMID: 39804724 PMC: 11727710. DOI: 10.1093/gigascience/giae106.


Teaching of reflection in higher education: a narrative review.

Phenwan T MedEdPublish (2016). 2024; 14:53.

PMID: 39130725 PMC: 11316171. DOI: 10.12688/mep.20389.1.


Overcoming citation bias is necessary for true inclusivity in Plant Science.

Pandey S, Burch-Smith T Plant Cell. 2023; 36(1):10-13.

PMID: 37742058 PMC: 10734568. DOI: 10.1093/plcell/koad248.


A new tool for evaluating health equity in academic journals; the Diversity Factor.

Gallifant J, Zhang J, Whebell S, Quion J, Escobar B, Gichoya J PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023; 3(8):e0002252.

PMID: 37578942 PMC: 10424852. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002252.

References
1.
FitzGerald C, Martin A, Berner D, Hurst S . Interventions designed to reduce implicit prejudices and implicit stereotypes in real world contexts: a systematic review. BMC Psychol. 2019; 7(1):29. PMC: 6524213. DOI: 10.1186/s40359-019-0299-7. View

2.
Hall K, Vogel A, Huang G, Serrano K, Rice E, Tsakraklides S . The science of team science: A review of the empirical evidence and research gaps on collaboration in science. Am Psychol. 2018; 73(4):532-548. DOI: 10.1037/amp0000319. View

3.
Petersen A, Fortunato S, Pan R, Kaski K, Penner O, Rungi A . Reputation and impact in academic careers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014; 111(43):15316-21. PMC: 4217436. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1323111111. View

4.
Garfield E . Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. Science. 1972; 178(4060):471-9. DOI: 10.1126/science.178.4060.471. View

5.
Callaham M, Wears R, Weber E . Journal prestige, publication bias, and other characteristics associated with citation of published studies in peer-reviewed journals. JAMA. 2002; 287(21):2847-50. DOI: 10.1001/jama.287.21.2847. View