» Articles » PMID: 35938032

Copy Number Variation of Circulating Tumor DNA (ctDNA) Detected Using NIPT in Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy-Treated Ovarian Cancer Patients

Overview
Journal Front Genet
Date 2022 Aug 8
PMID 35938032
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) can be used to characterize and monitor cancers. Recently, non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) as a new next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based approach has been applied for detecting ctDNA. This study aimed to investigate the copy number variations (CNVs) utilizing the non-invasive prenatal testing in plasma ctDNA from ovarian cancer (OC) patients who were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). The plasma samples of six patients, including stages II-IV, were collected during the pre- and post-NAC treatment that were divided into NAC-sensitive and NAC-resistant groups during the follow-up time. CNV analysis was performed using the NIPT via two methods "an open-source algorithm WISECONDORX and NextGENe software." Results of these methods were compared in pre- and post-NAC of OC patients. Finally, bioinformatics tools were used for data mining from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) to investigate CNVs in OC patients. WISECONDORX analysis indicated fewer CNV changes on chromosomes before treatment in the NAC-sensitive rather than NAC-resistant patients. NextGENe data indicated that CNVs are not only observed in the coding genes but also in non-coding genes. CNVs in six genes were identified, including HSF1, TMEM249, MROH1, GSTT2B, ABR, and NOMO2, only in NAC-resistant patients. The comparison of these six genes in NAC-resistant patients with The Cancer Genome Atlas data illustrated that the total alteration frequency is amplification, and the highest incidence of the CNVs (≥35% based on TCGA data) is found in MROH1, TMEM249, and HSF1 genes on the chromosome (Chr) 8. Based on TCGA data, survival analysis showed a significant reduction in the overall survival among chemotherapy-resistant patients as well as a high expression level of these three genes compared to that of sensitive samples (all, < 0.0001). The continued Chr8 study using WISECONDORX revealed CNV modifications in NAC-resistant patients prior to NAC therapy, but no CNV changes were observed in NAC-sensitive individuals. Our findings showed that low coverage whole-genome sequencing analysis used for NIPT could identify CNVs in ctDNA of OC patients before and after chemotherapy. These CNVs are different in NAC-sensitive and -resistant patients highlighting the potential application of this approach in cancer patient management.

Citing Articles

Circulating Tumour DNA for Ovarian Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment Monitoring: What Perspectives for Clinical Use?.

Asante D, Tierno D, Grassi G, Scaggiante B Int J Mol Sci. 2025; 26(5).

PMID: 40076521 PMC: 11900478. DOI: 10.3390/ijms26051889.


The Role of Circulating Tumor DNA in Ovarian Cancer.

Golara A, Kozlowski M, Cymbaluk-Ploska A Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(18).

PMID: 39335089 PMC: 11430586. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16183117.


Novel liquid biopsy CNV biomarkers in malignant melanoma.

Lukacova E, Hanzlikova Z, Podlesnyi P, Sedlackova T, Szemes T, Grendar M Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):15786.

PMID: 38982214 PMC: 11233564. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-65928-y.


Non-invasive prenatal testing: when results suggests maternal cancer.

Lenaerts L, Theunis M, Amant F, Vermeesch J Med Genet. 2024; 35(4):285-295.

PMID: 38835737 PMC: 11006267. DOI: 10.1515/medgen-2023-2055.


Current Applications and Challenges of Next-Generation Sequencing in Plasma Circulating Tumour DNA of Ovarian Cancer.

Roque R, Ribeiro I, Figueiredo-Dias M, Gourley C, Carreira I Biology (Basel). 2024; 13(2).

PMID: 38392306 PMC: 10886635. DOI: 10.3390/biology13020088.


References
1.
Filoche S, Lawton B, Beard A, Dowell A, Stone P . New screen on the block: non-invasive prenatal testing for fetal chromosomal abnormalities. J Prim Health Care. 2018; 9(4):248-253. DOI: 10.1071/HC16055. View

2.
Mathai R, Vidya R, Reddy B, Thomas L, Udupa K, Kolesar J . Potential Utility of Liquid Biopsy as a Diagnostic and Prognostic Tool for the Assessment of Solid Tumors: Implications in the Precision Oncology. J Clin Med. 2019; 8(3). PMC: 6463095. DOI: 10.3390/jcm8030373. View

3.
Le Page C, Huntsman D, Provencher D, Mes-Masson A . Predictive and prognostic protein biomarkers in epithelial ovarian cancer: recommendation for future studies. Cancers (Basel). 2013; 2(2):913-54. PMC: 3835111. DOI: 10.3390/cancers2020913. View

4.
Qidwai T . Exploration of copy number variation in genes related to anti-malarial drug resistance in Plasmodium falciparum. Gene. 2020; 736:144414. DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2020.144414. View

5.
Chen F, Fan Y, Cao P, Liu B, Hou J, Zhang B . Pan-Cancer Analysis of the Prognostic and Immunological Role of HSF1: A Potential Target for Survival and Immunotherapy. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2021; 2021:5551036. PMC: 8238600. DOI: 10.1155/2021/5551036. View