» Articles » PMID: 35937149

Comparison of the Success Rate of Filled and Unfilled Resin-Based Fissure Sealants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Overview
Journal Front Dent
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2022 Aug 8
PMID 35937149
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Incorporation of fillers might improve the physical properties of sealants. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the retention and caries development rate of filled and unfilled fissure sealants. This study was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. The PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and ISI Web of Knowledge were searched until October 24, 2019. The risk of bias (ROB) was assessed for the included studies based on the Cochrane collaboration common scheme for bias, and the meta-analysis was performed through a random effects model. The search resulted in 6,336 unrepeated relevant studies. After the title, abstract and full-text screening, 19 studies with 26 comparing groups were finally included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. According to the included studies, both retention rate and caries development in filled and unfilled resin-based sealants did not significantly differ within 2 years of follow-up. Since there was no significant difference in the retention rate and caries development between filled and unfilled sealants, it seems that the final decision should be made uniquely for each patient according to the type of fissure, patient's age, habits, etc.

Citing Articles

Comparison of the clinical performance of self-adhering flowable composite and resin-based pit and fissure sealant: a randomized clinical trial in pediatric patients.

Gisour E, Jahanimoghadam F, Aftabi R BMC Oral Health. 2024; 24(1):943.

PMID: 39143632 PMC: 11325582. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-024-04449-6.


Clinical effectiveness of pit and fissure sealants in primary and permanent teeth of children and adolescents: an umbrella review.

Amend S, Boutsiouki C, Winter J, Kloukos D, Frankenberger R, Kramer N Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2024; 25(3):289-315.

PMID: 38488955 PMC: 11233332. DOI: 10.1007/s40368-024-00876-9.


Evaluation of the effectiveness of prophylactic sealing of pits and fissures of permanent teeth with fissure sealants - umbrella review.

Wnuk K, Switalski J, Miazga W, Tatara T, Religioni U, Gujski M BMC Oral Health. 2023; 23(1):806.

PMID: 37891656 PMC: 10612169. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-023-03499-6.

References
1.
Galo R, Contente M, Borsatto M . Wear of two pit and fissure sealants in contact with primary teeth. Eur J Dent. 2014; 8(2):241-248. PMC: 4054057. DOI: 10.4103/1305-7456.130619. View

2.
Garg N, Indushekar K, Saraf B, Sheoran N, Sardana D . Comparative Evaluation of Penetration Ability of Three Pit and Fissure Sealants and Their Relationship with Fissure Patterns. J Dent (Shiraz). 2018; 19(2):92-99. PMC: 5960740. View

3.
Beun S, Bailly C, Devaux J, Leloup G . Physical, mechanical and rheological characterization of resin-based pit and fissure sealants compared to flowable resin composites. Dent Mater. 2011; 28(4):349-59. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2011.11.001. View

4.
Welbury R, Raadal M, Lygidakis N . EAPD guidelines for the use of pit and fissure sealants. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2004; 5(3):179-84. View

5.
. Clinical evaluation of a medium-filled flowable restorative material as a pit and fissure sealant. Oper Dent. 2002; 27(4):325-9. View