» Articles » PMID: 35936986

The MICA-NKG2D Axis in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Bolsters MICA As Target in Immuno-oncology

Abstract

NKG2D is a major natural killer (NK) cell-activating receptor that recognizes eight ligands (NKG2DLs), including MICA, and whose engagement triggers NK cell effector functions. As NKG2DLs are upregulated on tumor cells but tumors can subvert the NKG2D-NKG2DL axis, NKG2DLs constitute attractive targets for antibody (Ab)-based immuno-oncology therapies. However, such approaches require a deep characterization of NKG2DLs and NKG2D cell surface expression on primary tumor and immune cells. Here, using a bioinformatic analysis, we observed that MICA is overexpressed in renal cell carcinoma (RCC), and we also detected an association between the NKG2D-MICA axis and a diminished overall survival of RCC patients. Also, by flow cytometry (FC), we observed that MICA was the only NKG2DL over-expressed on clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) tumor cells, including cancer stem cells (CSC) that also coexpressed NKG2D. Moreover, tumor-infiltrating leukocytes (TIL), but not peripheral blood lymphoid cells (PBL) from ccRCC patients, over-expressed MICA, ULBP3 and ULBP4. In addition, NKG2D was downregulated on peripheral blood NK cells (PBNK) from ccRCC patients but upregulated on tumor-infiltrating NK cells (TINK). These TINK exhibited impaired degranulation that negatively correlated with NKG2D expression, diminished IFN-γ production, upregulation of TIM-3, and an impaired glucose intake upon stimulation with cytokines, indicating that they are dysfunctional, display features of exhaustion and an altered metabolic fitness. We conclude that ccRCC patients exhibit a distorted MICA-NKG2D axis, and MICA emerges as the forefront NKG2DL for the development of targeted therapies in ccRCC.

Citing Articles

NK cells in renal cell carcinoma and its implications for CAR-NK therapy.

Li X, Zhang Y, Ye Y, Xiao W, Liu L, Zhang X Front Cell Dev Biol. 2025; 13:1532491.

PMID: 40052147 PMC: 11882582. DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2025.1532491.


Novel gene manipulation approaches to unlock the existing bottlenecks of CAR-NK cell therapy.

Dehghan F, Metanat Y, Askarizadeh M, Ahmadi E, Moradi V Front Cell Dev Biol. 2025; 12:1511931.

PMID: 40007761 PMC: 11850336. DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2024.1511931.


Natural killer cell engagers for cancer immunotherapy.

Nikkhoi S, Li G, Hatefi A Front Oncol. 2025; 14:1483884.

PMID: 39911822 PMC: 11794116. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1483884.


Master regulator: p53's pivotal role in steering NK-cell tumor patrol.

Wang H, Chen Q, Liu Q, Luo C Front Immunol. 2024; 15:1428653.

PMID: 39185404 PMC: 11344261. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1428653.


CircARAP2 controls sMICA-induced NK cell desensitization by erasing CTCF/PRC2-induced suppression in early endosome marker RAB5A.

Guo F, Du N, Wen X, Li Z, Guo Y, Zhou L Cell Mol Life Sci. 2024; 81(1):307.

PMID: 39048814 PMC: 11335232. DOI: 10.1007/s00018-024-05285-1.


References
1.
Annese T, Tamma R, Ribatti D . Update in TIGIT Immune-Checkpoint Role in Cancer. Front Oncol. 2022; 12:871085. PMC: 9152184. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.871085. View

2.
Myers J, Miller J . Exploring the NK cell platform for cancer immunotherapy. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2020; 18(2):85-100. PMC: 8316981. DOI: 10.1038/s41571-020-0426-7. View

3.
Watson N, Spendlove I, Madjd Z, McGilvray R, Green A, Ellis I . Expression of the stress-related MHC class I chain-related protein MICA is an indicator of good prognosis in colorectal cancer patients. Int J Cancer. 2005; 118(6):1445-52. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.21510. View

4.
Lu S, Zhang J, Liu D, Li G, Staveley-OCarroll K, Li Z . Nonblocking Monoclonal Antibody Targeting Soluble MIC Revamps Endogenous Innate and Adaptive Antitumor Responses and Eliminates Primary and Metastatic Tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2015; 21(21):4819-30. PMC: 4631684. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-0845. View

5.
Ochoa M, Minute L, Rodriguez I, Garasa S, Perez-Ruiz E, Inoges S . Antibody-dependent cell cytotoxicity: immunotherapy strategies enhancing effector NK cells. Immunol Cell Biol. 2017; 95(4):347-355. DOI: 10.1038/icb.2017.6. View