» Articles » PMID: 35936953

Use of Stroke Scales in Clinical Practice: Current Concepts

Overview
Specialty Emergency Medicine
Date 2022 Aug 8
PMID 35936953
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

With stroke being the leading global cause of disability in adults, the use of clinical rating scales in stroke patients is important not only for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes but also for prognostic and care implications. Scales that quantify neurological disability can be particularly useful for assessing and guiding decisions in acute management and rehabilitative treatment. We analyzed and discussed some of the main rating scales most used in stroke in clinical practice, which measure both acute neurological deficit and functional outcome in stroke. In acute stroke, it is that in most cases, the scales evaluate a neurological deficit attributable to an alteration of the anterior and not posterior circulation and most of them assess a moderate stroke rather than a mild or severe one. In a rehabilitation treatment, they are sometimes too simplified; thus, the patient can reach a near-normal score and can have significant cognitive deficits that can affect both the possibility of communication and the reliability of responses. A patient with autonomy in the activities of daily living may not be completely autonomous. In future, the use of composite rating scales could be useful for a detailed measurement of neurological deficits in acute stroke and better assess the efficacy of a treatment and functional outcome.

Citing Articles

Prognostic analysis of endovascular mechanical thrombectomy in stroke patients with acute internal carotid artery obstruction based on circle of Willis variation.

Qiu T, Luo H, Bao W Front Neurol. 2025; 15():1428721.

PMID: 39845931 PMC: 11752900. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1428721.


Prevalence and correlates of post-stroke anxiety in Changde, China during 2023 following the lifting of COVID-19 restrictions.

Luo S, Hong Y, Wen J, Zhang X Front Psychiatry. 2024; 15:1430034.

PMID: 39403325 PMC: 11472574. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1430034.


Risk Factors for Post-Stroke Depression Following the Lifting of COVID-19 Restrictions.

Luo S, Hu X, Hong Y, Gao Y, Liu X, Peng Y Int J Gen Med. 2024; 17:3479-3491.

PMID: 39161406 PMC: 11331147. DOI: 10.2147/IJGM.S472339.


Predictors of 7-day symptomatic hemorrhagic transformation in patients with acute ischemic stroke and proposal of a novel screening tool: A retrospective cohort study.

Islam M, Uygun C, Delipoyraz M, Satici M, Kurt S, Ademoglu E Turk J Emerg Med. 2023; 23(3):176-183.

PMID: 37529787 PMC: 10389091. DOI: 10.4103/tjem.tjem_33_23.


Evaluation of Blood Biomarkers and Parameters for the Prediction of Stroke Survivors' Functional Outcome upon Discharge Utilizing Explainable Machine Learning.

Gkantzios A, Kokkotis C, Tsiptsios D, Moustakidis S, Gkartzonika E, Avramidis T Diagnostics (Basel). 2023; 13(3).

PMID: 36766637 PMC: 9914778. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13030532.


References
1.
Siniscalchi A, Gallelli L, Malferrari G, Pirritano D, Serra R, Santangelo E . Cerebral stroke injury: the role of cytokines and brain inflammation. J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol. 2014; 25(2):131-7. DOI: 10.1515/jbcpp-2013-0121. View

2.
Siniscalchi A, Sztajzel R, Malferrari G, Gallelli L . The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale: Its Role in Patients with Posterior Circulation Stroke. Hosp Top. 2017; 95(4):79-81. DOI: 10.1080/00185868.2017.1322888. View

3.
Edwards D, Chen Y, Diringer M . Unified Neurological Stroke Scale is valid in ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke. Stroke. 1995; 26(10):1852-8. DOI: 10.1161/01.str.26.10.1852. View

4.
Brautigam K, Flemming A, Schulz H, Dassen T . [How reliable is the Functional Independence Measure (FMI)?]. Pflege. 2002; 15(3):131-6. DOI: 10.1024/1012-5302.15.3.131. View

5.
Bland J, Altman D . Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res. 1999; 8(2):135-60. DOI: 10.1177/096228029900800204. View