» Articles » PMID: 35933367

Improved Prediction of Gene Expression Through Integrating Cell Signalling Models with Machine Learning

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Biology
Date 2022 Aug 6
PMID 35933367
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: A key problem in bioinformatics is that of predicting gene expression levels. There are two broad approaches: use of mechanistic models that aim to directly simulate the underlying biology, and use of machine learning (ML) to empirically predict expression levels from descriptors of the experiments. There are advantages and disadvantages to both approaches: mechanistic models more directly reflect the underlying biological causation, but do not directly utilize the available empirical data; while ML methods do not fully utilize existing biological knowledge.

Results: Here, we investigate overcoming these disadvantages by integrating mechanistic cell signalling models with ML. Our approach to integration is to augment ML with similarity features (attributes) computed from cell signalling models. Seven sets of different similarity feature were generated using graph theory. Each set of features was in turn used to learn multi-target regression models. All the features have significantly improved accuracy over the baseline model - without the similarity features. Finally, the seven multi-target regression models were stacked together to form an overall prediction model that was significantly better than the baseline on 95% of genes on an independent test set. The similarity features enable this stacking model to provide interpretable knowledge about cancer, e.g. the role of ERBB3 in the MCF7 breast cancer cell line.

Conclusion: Integrating mechanistic models as graphs helps to both improve the predictive results of machine learning models, and to provide biological knowledge about genes that can help in building state-of-the-art mechanistic models.

Citing Articles

Transitioning from wet lab to artificial intelligence: a systematic review of AI predictors in CRISPR.

Abbasi A, Asim M, Dengel A J Transl Med. 2025; 23(1):153.

PMID: 39905452 PMC: 11796103. DOI: 10.1186/s12967-024-06013-w.


RNA sequence analysis landscape: A comprehensive review of task types, databases, datasets, word embedding methods, and language models.

Asim M, Ibrahim M, Asif T, Dengel A Heliyon. 2025; 11(2):e41488.

PMID: 39897847 PMC: 11783440. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e41488.


Deep learning in bioinformatics.

Yousef M, Allmer J Turk J Biol. 2024; 47(6):366-382.

PMID: 38681776 PMC: 11045206. DOI: 10.55730/1300-0152.2671.


Incorporating knowledge of disease-defining hub genes and regulatory network into a machine learning-based model for predicting treatment response in lupus nephritis after the first renal flare.

Lee D, Tsai P, Chen C, Dai Y J Transl Med. 2023; 21(1):76.

PMID: 36737814 PMC: 9898995. DOI: 10.1186/s12967-023-03931-z.

References
1.
Beer M, Tavazoie S . Predicting gene expression from sequence. Cell. 2004; 117(2):185-98. DOI: 10.1016/s0092-8674(04)00304-6. View

2.
Chen Y, Li Y, Narayan R, Subramanian A, Xie X . Gene expression inference with deep learning. Bioinformatics. 2016; 32(12):1832-9. PMC: 4908320. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw074. View

3.
Li F, Ambrosini G, Chu E, Plescia J, Tognin S, Marchisio P . Control of apoptosis and mitotic spindle checkpoint by survivin. Nature. 1998; 396(6711):580-4. DOI: 10.1038/25141. View

4.
Uhlen M, Oksvold P, Fagerberg L, Lundberg E, Jonasson K, Forsberg M . Towards a knowledge-based Human Protein Atlas. Nat Biotechnol. 2010; 28(12):1248-50. DOI: 10.1038/nbt1210-1248. View

5.
Im S, Lu Y, Bardia A, Harbeck N, Colleoni M, Franke F . Overall Survival with Ribociclib plus Endocrine Therapy in Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2019; 381(4):307-316. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1903765. View