» Articles » PMID: 35928765

Complex Nasal Reconstruction in a Wide-awake Ambulatory Setting: A Study of Efficacy and Perioperative Patient Experience

Overview
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2022 Aug 5
PMID 35928765
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Methods: A mixed-methods study was completed with retrospective chart review and patient-reported outcome questionnaire. The primary outcome measures were demographics, oncologic and surgical details, and postoperative complications. Secondary outcome measures were aesthetic outcomes and procedure tolerance, which were gathered from the FACE-Q questionnaire.

Results: Of the 22 patients who met inclusion criteria, nine patients (41%) had forehead flaps performed and 13 patients (59%) had multilayer reconstruction with local flaps and cartilage grafts. The average number of surgeries performed, including revisions, was 2.3 ± 0.2. The overall complication rate for reconstructions and revisions was 20%, most of these were minor complications. The overall subjective rating of patient's appearance was excellent with an average score of 83.9 (± 17.3) out of 100. There was minimal appearance distress as a product of the surgery with an average score of 84.9 (±18.8). On a scale of one to five, patients reported an average of 4.3 for convenience, 3.8 for efficiency of setup and procedure, and 3.4 out of 5 for comfortability with having an operation performed on their face wide awake.

Conclusion: Our study demonstrated that complex nasal reconstruction performed under local anesthetic in a minor procedure setting is a feasible and safe option with good patient-reported outcomes.

References
1.
Fedok F, Ferraro R, Kingsley C, Fornadley J . Operative times, postanesthesia recovery times, and complications during sinonasal surgery using general anesthesia and local anesthesia with sedation. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000; 122(4):560-6. DOI: 10.1067/mhn.2000.100495. View

2.
Harley D, Collins Jr D . Patient satisfaction after blepharoplasty performed as office surgery using oral medication with the patient under local anesthesia. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2007; 32(1):77-81. DOI: 10.1007/s00266-007-9014-9. View

3.
Salgarelli A, Bellini P, Multinu A, Magnoni C, Francomano M, Fantini F . Reconstruction of nasal skin cancer defects with local flaps. J Skin Cancer. 2011; 2011:181093. PMC: 3135072. DOI: 10.1155/2011/181093. View

4.
Uzun H, Bitik O, Kamburoglu H, Dadaci M, Calis M, Ocal E . Assessment of Patients Who Underwent Nasal Reconstruction After Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer Excision. J Craniofac Surg. 2015; 26(4):1299-303. DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000001563. View

5.
Scott J, Sowerby L, Rotenberg B . Office-based rhinologic surgery: A modern experience with operative techniques under local anesthetic. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2017; 31(2):135-138. DOI: 10.2500/ajra.2017.31.4414. View