» Articles » PMID: 35928702

Safety and Efficacy of Pentazocine-midazolam Combination for Pain and Anxiety Relief in Radiofrequency Ablation Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Overview
Journal JGH Open
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2022 Aug 5
PMID 35928702
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Aim: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) therapy is frequently used as first-line treatment for small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). RFA is often associated with pain; however, no definitive solution has been established for its relief. We retrospectively analyzed the safety and efficacy of the combination of pentazocine and midazolam to relieve pain experienced by HCC patients undergoing RFA.

Methods: We studied 77 patients with 98 HCCs treated with RFA between January 2015 and August 2019. Patients were divided into two groups: the sedative-free group, which included those who received pentazocine alone, and the pentazocine-midazolam group, which included those who received a combination of pentazocine and midazolam. The degrees of analgesia and sedation were evaluated using the numerical rating scale (NRS) and the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS), respectively. Other parameters such as treatment time, awakening time, midazolam dosage, vital signs, local recurrence rate, and time to recurrence were also examined.

Results: The median NRS score and RASS score were significantly lower in the pentazocine-midazolam group. Ninety-five percent of patients in the pentazocine-midazolam group had no memory of the RFA session. The treatment time and awakening time were prolonged for the pentazocine-midazolam group. No significant differences in oxygen saturation, recurrence rates, and time to local recurrence were observed between groups.

Conclusion: A combination of pentazocine and midazolam is safe and effective for pain and anxiety relief experienced by patients undergoing RFA for local treatment of HCC.

Citing Articles

Comparison of sedation with pentazocine or pethidine hydrochloride for endoscopic ultrasonography in outpatients: A single-center retrospective study.

Urabe M, Ikezawa K, Seiki Y, Watsuji K, Kawamoto Y, Hirao T DEN Open. 2025; 5(1):e70048.

PMID: 39741901 PMC: 11687558. DOI: 10.1002/deo2.70048.

References
1.
Sessler C, Grap M, Brophy G . Multidisciplinary management of sedation and analgesia in critical care. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2005; 22(2):211-26. DOI: 10.1055/s-2001-13834. View

2.
Ramsay M, Savege T, Simpson B, Goodwin R . Controlled sedation with alphaxalone-alphadolone. Br Med J. 1974; 2(5920):656-9. PMC: 1613102. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.2.5920.656. View

3.
Hasegawa K, Makuuchi M, Takayama T, Kokudo N, Arii S, Okazaki M . Surgical resection vs. percutaneous ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: a preliminary report of the Japanese nationwide survey. J Hepatol. 2008; 49(4):589-94. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2008.05.018. View

4.
Kim Y, Lee W, Rhim H, Lim H, Choi D, Lee J . The minimal ablative margin of radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma (> 2 and < 5 cm) needed to prevent local tumor progression: 3D quantitative assessment using CT image fusion. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010; 195(3):758-65. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.09.2954. View

5.
Pan J, Li X, He Y, Jian C, Chen H, Hei Z . Comparison of dexmedetomidine vs. remifentanil combined with sevoflurane during radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2019; 20(1):28. PMC: 6326039. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-018-3010-z. View