» Articles » PMID: 35928422

Semantic Cues Modulate Children's and Adults' Processing of Audio-Visual Face Mask Speech

Overview
Journal Front Psychol
Date 2022 Aug 5
PMID 35928422
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

During the COVID-19 pandemic, questions have been raised about the impact of face masks on communication in classroom settings. However, it is unclear to what extent visual obstruction of the speaker's mouth or changes to the acoustic signal lead to speech processing difficulties, and whether these effects can be mitigated by semantic predictability, i.e., the availability of contextual information. The present study investigated the acoustic and visual effects of face masks on speech intelligibility and processing speed under varying semantic predictability. Twenty-six children (aged 8-12) and twenty-six adults performed an internet-based cued shadowing task, in which they had to repeat aloud the last word of sentences presented in audio-visual format. The results showed that children and adults made more mistakes and responded more slowly when listening to face mask speech compared to speech produced without a face mask. Adults were only significantly affected by face mask speech when both the acoustic and the visual signal were degraded. While acoustic mask effects were similar for children, removal of visual speech cues through the face mask affected children to a lesser degree. However, high semantic predictability reduced audio-visual mask effects, leading to full compensation of the acoustically degraded mask speech in the adult group. Even though children did not fully compensate for face mask speech with high semantic predictability, overall, they still profited from semantic cues in all conditions. Therefore, in classroom settings, strategies that increase contextual information such as building on students' prior knowledge, using keywords, and providing visual aids, are likely to help overcome any adverse face mask effects.

Citing Articles

[Effects of Wearing Face Masks to Prevent Infectious Diseases On Children's and Adolescents' Well-Being and Behavior: An Interview Study].

Drossler S, Horvath K, Freiberg A, Kampf D, Spura A, Buhs B Gesundheitswesen. 2023; 85(8-09):688-696.

PMID: 37327813 PMC: 11248369. DOI: 10.1055/a-2075-7814.

References
1.
Buchan J, Pare M, Munhall K . The effect of varying talker identity and listening conditions on gaze behavior during audiovisual speech perception. Brain Res. 2008; 1242:162-71. PMC: 2630206. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.06.083. View

2.
van de Rijt L, Roye A, Mylanus E, Van Opstal A, van Wanrooij M . The Principle of Inverse Effectiveness in Audiovisual Speech Perception. Front Hum Neurosci. 2019; 13:335. PMC: 6775866. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00335. View

3.
Bottalico P, Murgia S, Puglisi G, Astolfi A, Kirk K . Effect of masks on speech intelligibility in auralized classrooms. J Acoust Soc Am. 2020; 148(5):2878. PMC: 7857496. DOI: 10.1121/10.0002450. View

4.
Massaro D, Thompson L, Barron B, Laren E . Developmental changes in visual and auditory contributions to speech perception. J Exp Child Psychol. 1986; 41(1):93-113. DOI: 10.1016/0022-0965(86)90053-6. View

5.
Smith N, Gibilisco C, Meisinger R, Hankey M . Asymmetry in infants' selective attention to facial features during visual processing of infant-directed speech. Front Psychol. 2013; 4:601. PMC: 3769626. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00601. View